Thanks for putting up a focused (at least intend to be) thread on the subject.
Now, I've been tracking indiana-discuss last week or so, but still feel there
is a conflict on what indiana should be.
Current consensus seems like indiana is to be a minimum/core distro for other
distro to refer, to
Hey,
Mario Goebbels wrote:
> In regards to the first bullet point, something that could accelerate the
> conception of OpenSolaris distros would be an installer building kit. It
> should
> allow building different types of installers, from constructing a simple RAM
> disk suited to execute user c
In regards to the first bullet point, something that could accelerate the
conception of OpenSolaris distros would be an installer building kit. It should
allow building different types of installers, from constructing a simple RAM
disk suited to execute user code (custom made installer), to an b
