On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 01:41, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
> Peter, could I possibly get you to log a support call on this so we can
> get the appropriate escalation path in place to get a fix done.
>
> Provide the bug-id, a pointer to this thread on the jive server and note
> that a PTS-Kernel Enginee
Alan Hargreaves wrote:
> Peter, could I possibly get you to log a support call on this so we can
> get the appropriate escalation path in place to get a fix done.
>
> Provide the bug-id, a pointer to this thread on the jive server and note
> that a PTS-Kernel Engineer (me), specifically asked for
Peter, could I possibly get you to log a support call on this so we can
get the appropriate escalation path in place to get a fix done.
Provide the bug-id, a pointer to this thread on the jive server and note
that a PTS-Kernel Engineer (me), specifically asked for this to be
escalated.
alan.
The obvious next question is, is anyone backporting this to the s10
kernel patch?
alan.
Dana H. Myers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW: thermal zone handling was introduced in Nevada build 40 as part of:
6363985 acpica: Metropolis SMB Alerts result in high background system load
Metropol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> BTW: thermal zone handling was introduced in Nevada build 40 as part of:
>
> 6363985 acpica: Metropolis SMB Alerts result in high background system load
>
> Metropolis, of course, is the W2100z
>
>
> (The "thermal" event can happen in overtemp conditions and some
>
BTW: thermal zone handling was introduced in Nevada build 40 as part of:
6363985 acpica: Metropolis SMB Alerts result in high background system load
Metropolis, of course, is the W2100z
(The "thermal" event can happen in overtemp conditions and some
other conditions; if the _TMP method is nev
>Could be. At least, I ran frkit, installed acpidrv, and the problem
>vanished. Haven't even rebooted yet.
Yes, most probably it then.
The driver does attach immediately when it is installed;
"batstat -t" will show you the thermal zones configured in the
system.
If there was a thermal interrupt
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 09:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >The only hint from /var/adm/messages is:
> >
> >Jul 11 16:24:32 platinum unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is
> >being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels.
> >Jul 11 16:24:32 platinum This may result in reduced system pe
>The only hint from /var/adm/messages is:
>
>Jul 11 16:24:32 platinum unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is
>being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels.
>Jul 11 16:24:32 platinum This may result in reduced system performance.
>
>But whether that's relevant is another matter.
T
Yesterday I upgraded a W2100z from S10U1 to S10U2. No
obvious problems, but some weird behaviour is now cropping
up:
The machine has a load average of 1 when idle:
load averages: 0.87, 0.89, 0.89
89 processes: 87 sleeping, 1 running, 1 on cpu
CPU states: 47.5% idle, 0.8% user, 51.7% kernel,
10 matches
Mail list logo
