Re: [osol-discuss] Scientific programs for indiana?

2008-08-02 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
> Hi all, > > Anybody know where to get packages for some common > scientific programs such as: > > R + packages > python + packages... numpy, scipy, pylab > fftw > some sort of tex distribution + packages > octave > > I had my first exposure to Solaris as an undergrad > working in a computation

Re: [osol-discuss] Scientific programs for indiana?

2008-08-03 Thread Akhilesh Mritunjai
I've build R on SXCE nv84. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Desktop% R R version 2.6.2 (2008-02-08) Copyright (C) 2008 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0 I built it using Sun Studio Express... so I didn't have to build atlas/blas as SS includes it as perflib. The only bad issue I h

Re: [osol-discuss] Scientific programs for indiana?

2008-08-03 Thread Dennis Clarke
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Akhilesh Mritunjai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've build R on SXCE nv84. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Desktop% R > R version 2.6.2 (2008-02-08) > Copyright (C) 2008 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing > ISBN 3-900051-07-0 > > I built it using Sun Studio Express.

Re: [osol-discuss] Scientific programs for indiana?

2008-08-04 Thread Brian Cameron
It would be nice to get spec-files into the spec-files-extra project so that end users can more easily build these products with the CBE. spec-files-extra is discussed here: http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/ Brian Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote: > I've build R on SXCE nv84. > > [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [osol-discuss] Scientific programs for indiana?

2008-08-04 Thread Akhilesh Mritunjai
Yes, it'd be easy as R doesn't need any patches, but there is a problem. Unless you're building with ss12/ssexpress, you'll need ATLAS or at least some rudimentary blas library (I think R includes one). Using the rudimentary ones won't give expected performance though. So I think, first some wo

Re: [osol-discuss] Scientific programs for indiana?

2008-08-04 Thread Akhilesh Mritunjai
... And I don't think redistributing binaries built with SS12/exp would be any good. They'd be dependent on perflib, which isn't freely redistributable. Also, can someone coax Intel/AMD into releasing their math libraries on OS/nevada/solaris ? This message posted from opensolaris.org __