Re: [osol-discuss] Sun UltraSparc: XVR-500, Expert 3D, legacy graphic card

2009-11-04 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
I've complained about the same issues before. I understand the need to move onto Xorg and drop Xsun. At the same time, I understand that Sun really isn't in the SPARC workstation business anymore and is hoping that people will buy a Intel PC from them for running Solaris 10 or OpenSolaris on

Re: [osol-discuss] Sun UltraSparc: XVR-500, Expert 3D, legacy graphic card

2009-11-04 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Richard L. Hamilton wrote: Could Xorg be built to handle a particular list of loadable (separate) community-supported drivers, so that those could be added without replacing Xorg itself? That wouldn't be perfect, but it would be a lot better than nothing. Xorg has no problem loading new

Re: [osol-discuss] Sun UltraSparc: XVR-500, Expert 3D, legacy graphic card

2009-11-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
Xorg has no problem loading new drivers at runtime, without recompiling.   When using PCI vendor id to autoselect a driver, you'll need an xorg.conf to tell Xorg which driver to load when it's not in the builtin list.  For SPARC, where /dev/fb mapping is mainly used for selecting a fb driver,

Re: [osol-discuss] Sun UltraSparc: XVR-500, Expert 3D, legacy graphic card

2009-11-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote: Replacing the server would currently be necessary for 2 basic reasons: I forgot the only 2 basic reasons. Of course the goal should be to get the changes stable and move them upstream, so that it won't longer be necessary,