Hi all,
S10 FCS' JDS is built on GNOME 2.6 (or thereabouts); apart from
"just knowing", is there anyway to determine what version of GNOME
one is using? On a related subject, what are the timescales for
basing GNOME on GNOME 2.10 or 2.12 (for those of us who don't want
to compile form scratch)?
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:12 -0800, Rich Teer wrote:
> S10 FCS' JDS is built on GNOME 2.6 (or thereabouts); apart from
> "just knowing", is there anyway to determine what version of GNOME
> one is using?
Not sure if there is one true method of identifying the version of
gnome. Some things to try:
Hey,
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 18:53 -0500, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> > On a related subject, what are the timescales for
> > basing GNOME on GNOME 2.10 or 2.12 (for those of us who don't want
> > to compile form scratch)?
>
> I agree it would be nice to put some binary packages out there.
> Produ
--- Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 18:53 -0500, Laszlo (Laca)
> Peter wrote:
> > > On a related subject, what are the timescales
> for
> > > basing GNOME on GNOME 2.10 or 2.12 (for those of
> us who don't want
> > > to compile form scratch)?
>
> > Our
ken mays wrote:
--- Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 18:53 -0500, Laszlo (Laca)
Peter wrote:
On a related subject, what are the timescales
for
basing GNOME on GNOME 2.10 or 2.12 (for those of
us who don't want
to compi
--- Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ken mays wrote:
>
> >--- Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hey,
> >>
> >>On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 18:53 -0500, Laszlo (Laca)
> >>Peter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> On a related subject, what are the timescales
>
> >
> correct? Any sense of how difficult that would be? E.g. how much would
> the sources have to be tailored to build properly on say, Solaris 8?
It's not so much the tailoring of the sources that would be needed,
but adding all those non-gnome dependencies that are part of Solaris 10
but weren't p
Hey,
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 07:32 -0800, ken mays wrote:
> You have a valid point in which where is the new JDS
> 'binaries' posted based on GNOME 2.12.x?? I'd thought
> of a simple FTP area (like where Schillix and Belenix
> are mirrored). I've been reviewing and working on the
> vanilla GNOME 2.1
Hey,
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 09:33 -0800, ken mays wrote:
> Well, I'll await Glynn's notes from the desktop
> summit. Whatever Sun and the community think is the
> best way to move forward in supporting GNOME on
> Solaris. I'll await the release of the JDS GNOME
> 2.12.x binaries on Friday to see wh
Hello everybody..
Does anybody know how to get the WWN from a QLC HBA under solaris x86 ?
Ive tried luxadm probe, happens nothing.
Prtconv -pv shows me no WWN.
prpicl shows me no WWN also.
The board is working.
The driver SUNWqlc is working.
The device gets "ONLINE" "OFFLINE" inserting fiber.
10 matches
Mail list logo
