On 09/01/06 01:59, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I have SVM metadevices defined in the usual way.
# metattach d7 d27
d7: submirror d27 is attached
metattach: mars: /dev/md/dsk/d0: not a metadevice
#
That last message makes no sense. I already have d0 defined and setup
fine. So .. where did that w
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Hi
On 09/01/06 01:59, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I have SVM metadevices defined in the usual way.
# metattach d7 d27
d7: submirror d27 is attached
metattach: mars: /dev/md/dsk/d0: not a metadevice
#
That last message makes no sense. I already have d0 defined and setup
fine.
> Hi
>
> On 09/01/06 01:59, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> I have SVM metadevices defined in the usual way.
>>
>> # metattach d7 d27
>> d7: submirror d27 is attached
>> metattach: mars: /dev/md/dsk/d0: not a metadevice
>>
>> #
>>
>>
>> That last message makes no sense. I already have d0 defined and setu
Hi
On 09/01/06 01:59, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I have SVM metadevices defined in the usual way.
# metattach d7 d27
d7: submirror d27 is attached
metattach: mars: /dev/md/dsk/d0: not a metadevice
#
That last message makes no sense. I already have d0 defined and setup
fine. So .. where did that
I have SVM metadevices defined in the usual way.
# metattach d7 d27
d7: submirror d27 is attached
metattach: mars: /dev/md/dsk/d0: not a metadevice
#
That last message makes no sense. I already have d0 defined and setup
fine. So .. where did that weird message come from ?
Dennis Clarke
___