Re: [xwin-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] priorities for additional Solaris consolidations

2005-09-13 Thread Jay Cotton
Alan: You forgot FBPM. It makes sense that we should put that one out there. It will require some 'modifications' to be ready for prime time JC Alan Coopersmith wrote: Felix Schulte wrote: X Window System MED Maybe this should be changed to HIGH - Sun

Re: [osol-discuss] priorities for additional Solaris consolidations

2005-09-10 Thread Takaaki Higuchi
Karyn Ritter wrote: G11N MED Hope to be HIGH, for global involvements. regards, T.Higuchi ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] priorities for additional Solaris consolidations

2005-09-07 Thread Karyn Ritter
I've pulled together my preliminary thoughts on the relative priorities of open sourcing the other Solaris consolidations, and would like you all to comment on the list and priorities below. These priorities are not temporally influenced: we did not list consolidations as a HIGH priority just

Re: [osol-discuss] priorities for additional Solaris consolidations

2005-09-07 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-07 10:27]: On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 01:51, Karyn Ritter wrote: Consolidation Priority -- Sun Java System Application ServerLOW Isn't this already open

Re: [osol-discuss] priorities for additional Solaris consolidations

2005-09-07 Thread Stephen Hahn
* John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-07 10:49]: Karyn Ritter wrote: I've pulled together my preliminary thoughts on the relative priorities Karyn's complete sentence was precise: I've pulled together my preliminary thoughts on the relative priorities of open sourcing the other