Bonnie has just determined that sgen is clear to be open-sourced... I've
filed CR 640 to track it and will try to have the fix in this week
or next.
cheers,
steve
Erast Benson wrote:
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 11:14 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
sgen an be available in the ON closed bins tarball - I thought it
already was.
I'll see what's up.
Thanks.
Bonnie
As it's an area of code I have a current interest in, I can answer that
pretty quickly.
There is a nice long list of specific exclusions in the
Alan == Alan Hargreaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alan Any changes made to Steve's current copy of bindrop will need to
Alan be reflected in what I'm doing, so could I please be kept in the
Alan loop?
Is it time to put back those tools to the ON gate?
mike
Mike Kupfer wrote:
Alan == Alan Hargreaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alan Any changes made to Steve's current copy of bindrop will need to
Alan be reflected in what I'm doing, so could I please be kept in the
Alan loop?
Is it time to put back those tools to the ON gate?
mike
I can give you
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't have sgen even in closed bins. Without it we can not manage
SCSI tapes/changers. Any plans to include it in ON soon?
I don't understand. Does this mean that the tape changer SW uses sgen instead
of scg?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
James C. McPherson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A quick check of the copyright info on
usr/closed/uts/common/io/scsi/targets/sgen.c
reveals that another company developed the code. I don't know
what the status of any negotiations are that may or may not
have occurred about opening this file.
James C. McPherson wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
We don't have sgen even in closed bins. Without it we can not manage
SCSI tapes/changers. Any plans to include it in ON soon?
Any roadmap on those bits? What was the reason for not including them in
closed bins again? (sorry if this question were
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 11:14 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't have sgen even in closed bins. Without it we can not manage
SCSI tapes/changers. Any plans to include it in ON soon?
I don't understand. Does this mean that the tape changer SW uses
We don't have sgen even in closed bins. Without it we can not manage
SCSI tapes/changers. Any plans to include it in ON soon?
Any roadmap on those bits? What was the reason for not including them in
closed bins again? (sorry if this question were asked before)
Erast
Erast Benson wrote:
We don't have sgen even in closed bins. Without it we can not manage
SCSI tapes/changers. Any plans to include it in ON soon?
Any roadmap on those bits? What was the reason for not including them in
closed bins again? (sorry if this question were asked before)
Hi Erast,
A
10 matches
Mail list logo
