>> sorry, missed that .. the S/N ratio here can often be ... well you know.
> You could help that by having installation-related conversations on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oops .. sorry .. away I go to the correct maillist :-\
dc
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
controllers, terribly simple graphic
>
>>I think that the installer will still fail even in text mode.
>
> 512MB will work.
>
> Even 256MB works but requires a shrunk miniroot (I generally make one which
> is only 64MB in size as opposed to the standard 170MB; the latter gives
> precious little room on a 256MB system)
>
> Casper
>
s
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> [...]
>> Hello Moinak :
>>
>>I am working my way through a few Sun blueprint docs and trying to put
>> together a small bootable CDROM prototype that will allow me to pkg-get
>> all of the rest of the regular SUNW packages as well as a pile of CSW
>> packages. I figur
Dennis Clarke wrote:
[...]
Hello Moinak :
I am working my way through a few Sun blueprint docs and trying to put
together a small bootable CDROM prototype that will allow me to pkg-get
all of the rest of the regular SUNW packages as well as a pile of CSW
packages. I figure this sort of thing
>
>>I think that the installer will still fail even in text mode.
>
> 512MB will work.
>
> Even 256MB works but requires a shrunk miniroot (I generally make one which
> is only 64MB in size as opposed to the standard 170MB; the latter gives
> precious little room on a 256MB system)
64MB ? perfect
>I think that the installer will still fail even in text mode.
512MB will work.
Even 256MB works but requires a shrunk miniroot (I generally make one which
is only 64MB in size as opposed to the standard 170MB; the latter gives
precious little room on a 256MB system)
Casper
> Glenn Lagasse wrote:
>> * Dennis Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>>> I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
>>> at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
>>> and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SC
>>Am I to understand that the x86 miniroot on there will fill up all of my
>>RAM and still need more? Gee. Time for a new machine I guess but this
>>one won't die and it runs Solaris 10 just fine.
>>
>>So then, whats the minimal system spec that Solaris 11 is shooting for?
>>
>
> Solaris 11 stil
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* Dennis Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
controllers
>I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
>at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
>and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
>controllers, terribly simple graphics and no sound. It just works.[1]
>
>I
> * Dennis Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
>> at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
>> and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
>> controllers, terribl
* Dennis Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
> at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
> and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
> controllers, terribly simpl
Bart Smaalders writes:
> As has been repeatedly discussed here, the current memory requirements
> of the developer release installer are an artifact of its hurried
> implementation (eg 2 jvms). This will not continue to be the case.
It's also true that it's an artifact of upgrading in the slow a
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
>> at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
>> and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
>> controllers, terribly simple graphics and no
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
controllers, terribly simple graphics and no sound. It ju
I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
controllers, terribly simple graphics and no sound. It just works.[1]
I burned
17 matches
Mail list logo
