On Sat, 10 May 2008, GNU Watch wrote:
I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other
big whigs at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the
GPLv3. Many developers dont want to invest time to opensolaris until
it is under the GPLv3 because the CDDL doesnt
I searched and search and found nowhere where Jonathan or anyone said
that they would promise that OpenSolaris would be released under
GPLv.anything. All I see in the URLs you reference is hearsay from
sloppy tech journalists.
So if no promise was made, how would it be broken? It may be
well I am not going to post any more responses in reguards to this thread i
started as a mater of fact this will be my last thread. I just wanted to get
feed back from others to see how you all feel. I hold you all with the up most
respect and appreciate the overwelming feedback. Even though
GNU Watch wrote:
I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other big whigs
at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the GPLv3. Many
developers dont want to invest time to opensolaris until it is under the
GPLv3 because the CDDL doesnt protect users and
GNU Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other big whigs
at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the GPLv3. Many
developers dont want to invest time to opensolaris until it is under the
GPLv3 because the CDDL doesnt
Now let's stop this thread, it will not help us.
I can't even believe that anyone's arguing at all about this. Why? Take
a look:
GNU Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-mg
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
GNU Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey Shawn this promise was made over a year ago by Jonathan Schwartz and
Rich Green. The statement soon retracted by them which I understand bro but
they clearly said they are strongly considering it and there has been no
progress in that direction.
Mario Goebbels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now let's stop this thread, it will not help us.
I can't even believe that anyone's arguing at all about this. Why? Take
a look:
GNU Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For this reason, I mentioned that OpenSolaris contributors are known persons
;-)
The GPL is crap, I hope to god it doesn't get used. Corporations violate it all
the time, developers don't bother to read it, and it's an awful license to use
if you want to feed yourself with your efforts.
It mixes politics with business for people with too little balls to act
politically.
Tim Scanlon wrote:
The GPL is crap, I hope to god it doesn't get used. Corporations violate it
all the time, developers don't bother to read it, and it's an awful license
to use if you want to feed yourself with your efforts.
The thing I find mot odd about GPL is that if you work in a
I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other big whigs
at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the GPLv3. Many
developers dont want to invest time to opensolaris until it is under the GPLv3
because the CDDL doesnt protect users and developers freedoms as
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 9:10 PM, GNU Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other big whigs
at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the GPLv3. Many
developers dont want to invest time to opensolaris until it is under the
hey Shawn this promise was made over a year ago by Jonathan Schwartz and Rich
Green. The statement soon retracted by them which I understand bro but they
clearly said they are strongly considering it and there has been no progress in
that direction. Hey I appreciate your reply and dont mean
GNU Watch wrote:
I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other big whigs
at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the GPLv3.
Please don't try and start another license war. If there ever was a
promise, kindly quote it and not some second hand reference to
hey ian take it easy no one wants to start a licence war with you. I am just
trying to get feedback from the opensolaris community.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:41 PM, GNU Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey ian take it easy no one wants to start a licence war with you. I am just
trying to get feedback from the opensolaris community.
The general consensus among the community has been that we don't want
that license. We like
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 9:43 PM, GNU Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey Shawn this promise was made over a year ago by Jonathan Schwartz and
Rich Green. The statement soon retracted by them which I understand bro but
they clearly said they are strongly considering it and there has been no
thats great advice shawn I send sun an email, sun need to promote you for your
great feedback.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
GNU Watch wrote:
thats great advice shawn I send sun an email, sun need to promote you for
your great feedback.
What is? Please keep the context you are replying to.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Please don't feed the trolls
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
