Re: About |snprintf()| / was: Re: [osol-discuss] RFE: New version of |strcat()| ...

2006-04-09 Thread Roland Mainz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Carlson wrote: [snip] As for strMANYcat, the operation seems sort of obvious and somewhat useful, but I wonder how often in real, well-written code this situation actually comes up _and_ snprintf isn't a better answer. Umpf. See my original posting. My

About |snprintf()| / was: Re: [osol-discuss] RFE: New version of |strcat()| ...

2006-03-30 Thread Roland Mainz
James Carlson wrote: [snip] As for strMANYcat, the operation seems sort of obvious and somewhat useful, but I wonder how often in real, well-written code this situation actually comes up _and_ snprintf isn't a better answer. Umpf. See my original posting. My intention was to improve

Re: About |snprintf()| / was: Re: [osol-discuss] RFE: New version of |strcat()| ...

2006-03-30 Thread James Carlson
Roland Mainz writes: James Carlson wrote: [snip] As for strMANYcat, the operation seems sort of obvious and somewhat useful, but I wonder how often in real, well-written code this situation actually comes up _and_ snprintf isn't a better answer. Umpf. See my original posting. My

Re: About |snprintf()| / was: Re: [osol-discuss] RFE: New version of |strcat()| ...

2006-03-30 Thread Casper . Dik
James Carlson wrote: [snip] As for strMANYcat, the operation seems sort of obvious and somewhat useful, but I wonder how often in real, well-written code this situation actually comes up _and_ snprintf isn't a better answer. Umpf. See my original posting. My intention was to improve