Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Both LSB and Solaris approaches are broken, just in different ways ;-)
> >
> > Have a look at the PATH and MANPATH manipulation methods used on HP-UX.
>
> Do you have any examples around (or URLs to read) ?
Well, I did not find the right things, and
Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By definition /usr/bin/ should only contain the minimum set of
> executables for a system in networked multiuser mode (run level 3).
What you write herer was true for systems that have a real /bin/
Originlly, all official UNIX programs have been in /bin
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Chris Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1000s of programs in /usr/bin sucks, but it does offer two benefits over
> > the Solaris "shove everything in a different obscure dir" style:
>
>
>
> > 1. not have the one they want in their $PATH
> > 2. have the one they w
Erast Benson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 15:36 -0500, Chris Ricker wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > > My personal complaint is that they stuff everything into /usr/bin/. Unix
> > > had some kind of "namespace" support via the elements in ${PATH} so
> > > having package gro
Martin Man wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Martin Man wrote:
> >> David J. Orman wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >
> >> Was there a document at some point in history ( this is UNIX and it
> >> has tons of history ) called the FSSTD or was it FHS ?
>
