>
> More thoughts please! :)
Or you could continue using eiher Opensolaris 2009.06 or snv_b134 until Oracle
release what suppose to be Opensolaris replacement Solaris 11 Express at the
end of the year, and it is mention, that it might include "ZFS data
encryption", not seen anywhere else unt
On 10/ 6/10 03:18 AM, Steve wrote:
I guess another question is, if I am successful with 134b, it is of course still
"unstable" release. How much do i need to worry about that? I have seen a
fair amount of people on the internet stating they run solidly on 134b.
I am strictly using this as a
Steve wrote:
> I am currently upgrading to 134b. Using the openindiana legacy source.
That should just be 134, since Oracle never released 134a or 134b.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
__
@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-help] Opinions and how to move forward?
I guess another question is, if I am successful with 134b, it is of
course still "unstable" release. How much do i need to worry about
that? I have seen a fair amount of people on the internet stating they
run solidly on 1
I guess another question is, if I am successful with 134b, it is of course
still "unstable" release. How much do i need to worry about that? I have seen
a fair amount of people on the internet stating they run solidly on 134b.
I am strictly using this as a data storage server and ZFS is my rea
I had not planned on this having third party support.
I am currently upgrading to 134b. Using the openindiana legacy source. I plan
to test and see how this runs, and then choose whether to move forward or
completely to openindiana at this point.
I am mostly sure I will be sticking with 134b
If this is production, are you interested in third party support, e.g. Nexenta?
-Scott
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org
After working with OpenSolaris, I have considered moving to OpenIndiana or
Nexenta.
Basically, I am using OpenSolaris 2009.06. And I would like to move forward to
a later version of ZFS.
What is the general consensus on which way to go?
Can I patch up 2009.06 effectively and run on 134b? (cur
