Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: BUG-840: Viewer 3.4.2 (Beta) breaks almost every sliding door script in SL

2013-02-17 Thread Henri Beauchamp
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:25:36 +0100, Martin Fürholz wrote: > Hello Henri, > > first: no I cannot reproduce the issue with small prims. They are resized in > a viewer with my fix from <0.01, 0.01, 0.01> (whis is the minimum prim size > in the LL viewer) to <0.014, 0.014, 0.014> perfectly, just e

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: BUG-840: Viewer 3.4.2 (Beta) breaks almost every sliding door script in SL

2013-02-17 Thread Martin Fürholz
Hello, me and others cannot reproduce your 'nipple bug', neither with your 'cool nipples' from the marketplace, nor with the test setup you've given in your earlier mail. Neither with nor without my latest version of the fix for BUG-840, on LL Release and not either on the LL Beta viewer. If you

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: BUG-840: Viewer 3.4.2 (Beta) breaks almost every sliding door script in SL

2013-02-17 Thread Henri Beauchamp
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:59:47 +0100, Martin Fürholz wrote: > Hello, > me and others cannot reproduce your 'nipple bug', neither with your 'cool > nipples' from the marketplace, nor with the test setup you've given in your > earlier mail. You can deny all you want, but I do know what I am seeing

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: BUG-840: Viewer 3.4.2 (Beta) breaks almost every sliding door script in SL

2013-02-17 Thread Kirstie McKenzie
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:59:47 +0100, Martin Fürholz wrote: > > > Hello, > > me and others cannot reproduce your 'nipple bug', neither with your 'cool > > nipples' from the marketplace, nor with the test setup you've given in your > > earlier mail. > > You can deny all you want, but I do kn

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: BUG-840: Viewer 3.4.2 (Beta) breaks almost every sliding door script in SL

2013-02-17 Thread Henri Beauchamp
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:27:22 +0100, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:59:47 +0100, Martin Fürholz wrote: > > > Hello, > > me and others cannot reproduce your 'nipple bug', neither with your 'cool > > nipples' from the marketplace, nor with the test setup you've given in your > > e

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: BUG-840: Viewer 3.4.2 (Beta) breaks almost every sliding door script in SL

2013-02-17 Thread Martin Fürholz
Hello Henri, thank you for your video. I was able to 'kind-of' reproduce it partially in LL Viewer 3.4.5 (270263). The prim doesn't visually resize to it's full size, it's 10% smaller than it should be until I zoom out and back it. I will try to fix that and update the repository. Tyvm. I canno

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: BUG-840: Viewer 3.4.2 (Beta) breaks almost every sliding door script in SL

2013-02-17 Thread Henri Beauchamp
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:08:37 +0100, Martin Fürholz wrote: > Hello Henri, > thank you for your video. > > I was able to 'kind-of' reproduce it partially in LL Viewer 3.4.5 (270263). > The prim doesn't visually resize to it's full size, it's 10% smaller than it > should be until I zoom out and ba

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: BUG-840: Viewer 3.4.2 (Beta) breaks almost every sliding door script in SL

2013-02-17 Thread Carlo Wood
Not only sliding doors, my normal door stopped working too more than half the time; and a LOT of others scripted objects... Even watching it doesn't always help. On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:53:02 - "MartinRJ Fayray" wrote: > > --- > This i

[opensource-dev] Review Request: BUG-1709: Tiny prims do not rescale properly at very high viewer framerates

2013-02-17 Thread MartinRJ Fayray
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/617/ --- Review request for Viewer. Description --- At high framerates tiny pri

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: BUG-1709: Tiny prims do not rescale properly at very high viewer framerates

2013-02-17 Thread MartinRJ Fayray
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/617/ --- (Updated Feb. 17, 2013, 7:02 p.m.) Review request for Viewer. Description