"Titchener, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Well, also in the "apps" directory there's a file sc.c that purports
>> to be a version of s_client.c that has been doctored for Windows.
>> Some time ago, I asked if anyone saw any value in integrating it into
>> s_client.c.
> Yes. With one minor change
>Well, also in the "apps" directory there's a file sc.c that purports
>to be a version of s_client.c that has been doctored for Windows.
>Some time ago, I asked if anyone saw any value in integrating it into
>s_client.c.
Yes. With one minor change (add pktmp = X509_get_pubkey(peer); after line
7
On Sun, Apr 25, 1999 at 04:25:12PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> When configured with, e.g., --prefix=/usr/local, OpenSSL will install
> the following files outside its own directory ($prefix/ssl by default,
> or whatever is specified with the --openssldir option):
>
> /tmp$ ls usr/local/bin usr/
On Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 11:18:20AM -0400, Tom Titchener wrote:
> Finding the #ifndef WINDOWS in apps/s_client.c prevented me from
> using the otherwise-oh-so-complete feature set of this application
> on my OS 'of choice'
Well, also in the "apps" directory there's a file sc.c that purports
to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bodo Moeller) writes:
> Turns out that the Linux-specific parts of glibc 2.1 doesn't pay
> attention to the standards in the first place and _always_ defines
> errno to be that macro. So, unless (or until) there are also correct
> versions of the library, -D_REENTRANT is not n
> > crypto/opensslconf.h.in by Ulf). I don't see any need for it, so I've
> > folded the whole mumbo-jumbo to #undef BF_PTR:-)
>
> If BF_PTR should normally not be defined, we can simply remove it
> from opensslconf.h and the Configure script. Is that what you mean?
NO! That's defintely *NOT* wha
> crypto/opensslconf.h.in by Ulf). I don't see any need for it, so I've
> folded the whole mumbo-jumbo to #undef BF_PTR:-)
If BF_PTR should normally not be defined, we can simply remove it
from opensslconf.h and the Configure script. Is that what you mean?
(As long as it is in opensslconf.h.in, C
Wouldn't it be better to make multithreaded the default? That is what
the old script does, doesn't it?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAI
OpenSSL-Dev'ers -
Finding the #ifndef WINDOWS in apps/s_client.c prevented me from
using the otherwise-oh-so-complete feature set of this application
on my OS 'of choice' I decided that, instead of learning to work
around or through the peculiarities and special feeding of WINSOCK,
it would be a
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >>
> >> > OK, there is probably something on the website that tells
> >> me how to do
> >> > this, but I did not see it.
> >{ snip }
> >>
> >> By posting your patches to this list, i.e. do a diff between
> >> the origi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> > OK, there is probably something on the website that tells
>> me how to do
>> > this, but I did not see it.
>{ snip }
>>
>> By posting your patches to this list, i.e. do a diff between
>> the original
>> version and your fixed version and
Rich Salz wrote:
>
> Any consensus from the core folks on this?
>
> On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > X509_NAME_oneline takes an X509 name and returns
> > it as a set of slash-separated components:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > X509_NAME_print tries to turn it into a comma-se
Rich Salz wrote:
>
> Any consensus from the core folks on this?
Sure - go for it.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; ther
13 matches
Mail list logo
