I have made changes to Makefile and the results is the same:
compile error
===
cc -DMONOLITH -I../include -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DRSAref -DB_ENDIAN -D
BN_DIV2W -Ae +ESlit +O4 -z -c openssl.c
rm -f openssl
cc -o openssl -DMONOLITH -I../include
Hi !
I´m trying to add SSL to my httpserver and httpclient.
I have tried to use openssl to create certificates and set up my own CA
but I can´t get it work.(Only for testing)
I need some hints about:
- How to set up my own CA and create one server certificate and one
client certificate thats
YOu should always look at the errors generated by popping
up the error stack like this:
#include "/usr/local/ssl/include/err.h"
if (some_OpenSSL_function_returned_unexpected_results) {
printf("OpenSSL_function failed\n");
while ((ERR_no = ERR_get_error()))
printf("%s\n",
- Original Message -
From: Carl-Henrik Tano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 1999 8:56 AM
Subject: Problems with creating certificates and how to use them
Hi !
I´m trying to add SSL to my httpserver and httpclient.
I have tried to use openssl to create
Hallo,
I think in b_sock.c I've stumbled into some error cases in which some locking
isn't undone:
diff b_sock.c b_sock.fixed.c
250c250,251
if (ret == NULL) return(NULL);
---
if (ret == NULL)
goto err;
352,353c353,357
if (ret == NULL) return(NULL);
At 17:52 07.06.99 +0200, you wrote:
Hallo,
I think in b_sock.c I've stumbled into some error cases in which some locking
isn't undone:
sorry, wrong diff...
*** OpenSSL/crypto/bio/b_sock.c Mon Apr 26 19:00:12 1999
--- OpenSSL/crypto/bio/b_sock.fixed.c Mon Jun 7 17:46:45 1999
***
I new to SSL and would like to enable two applications to use http to
communicate, using SSL. Where could I find documentation and/or example
code for using the OpenSSL library in such a manner?
--
| Brian Wotring
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| http://www.ucs.usl.edu/~bjw5371
S/MIME
Is one of these 2 files obsolete?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 05:52:24PM +0200, Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
I think in b_sock.c I've stumbled into some error cases in which some locking
isn't undone:
It's wrong anyway, I haven't come around to change it ...
That caching gethostbyname function is only suitable for
single-threaded use
nobody Is one of these 2 files obsolete?
No. Consider them like makefile's, they take care of each their own
directory.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-161 43 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or
levitte nobody Is one of these 2 files obsolete?
levitte
levitte No. Consider them like makefile's, they take care of each their own
levitte directory.
... or, in the case of crypto/install.com, a directory tree.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken
When building openssl-0.9.3 on HP-UX 9.07 with the HP-UX native unbundled cc,
exptest dies with a floating point exception before even displaying the first
dot. This is independent from compiler optimization settings and reproducable
on different hardware. The stack tracebacks differ due to
bash-2.02$ ./config -t
Operating system: sparc64-whatever-linux2
Configuring for linux-elf
/usr/bin/perl ./Configure linux-elf
It wasn't difficult to guess what the Makefile should look like and
after that everything worked as expected. I compiled without any
assembler and with compiler
Goetz Babin-Ebell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think in b_sock.c I've stumbled into some error cases in which some locking
isn't undone:
- if (ret == NULL) return(NULL);
+ if (ret == NULL)
+ goto err;
- if (ret == NULL) return(NULL);
- if (j
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 11:54:43PM +0200, Andy Polyakov wrote:
When building openssl-0.9.3 on HP-UX 9.07 with the HP-UX native
unbundled cc, exptest dies [...]
Did the IRIX bug fix break this,
I find it hard to beleive.
[...]
Now the real problem:-) Being HP-UX illiterate (well, when it
When building openssl-0.9.3 on HP-UX 9.07 with the HP-UX native
unbundled cc, exptest dies [...]
Did the IRIX bug fix break this,
I find it hard to beleive.
[...]
The exception that was reported in the message starting this thread
was in line 98 of bn_asm.c, according to the
On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 01:12:00AM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
The exception that was reported in the message starting this thread
was in line 98 of bn_asm.c, according to the backtrace provided in
that message; but the compiler options did not include BN_LLONG,
Er, wrong. It's not in the
17 matches
Mail list logo
