Well First, check your email client software, it seems to send your
messages 3 times 1 is enough ;-)
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Super-User wrote:
> when I tape "./config -t" I see:
>
> gcc version 2.8.x
> Configuring for solaris-usparc-gcc
> /usr/l
> From: Erwann ABALEA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^ i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably still has no clue
whatsoever as long as [s]he's not a member of openssl-dev (well, I don't
know if [s]he is, but I bet [s]he isn't as I myself would never sign up
for a list as root
"Andrea e Luca Giacobazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >How are you going to handle multiple OUs? In the case where a certificate
> >contains 4 multiple OUs but a user DN only contains one of those 4?
>
> I search in LDAP just by e-mail, and I compare the whole certificate byte
> to byte with
>>How are you going to handle multiple OUs? In the case where a certificate
>>contains 4 multiple OUs but a user DN only contains one of those 4?
Shouldn't the user DN exactly match the "subject" field from the cert?
If not, when and why not?
>> I search in LDAP just by e-mail, and I compare th
>An alternative not mentioned is to make the callback type have a
>variable number of arguments, like
This requires all callbacks to be written as varargs programs.
(It often also means a different, slower, calling sequence.)
>This would still break existing code, but which would allow for more
Here is the LDAP cert validation code. I do not know if this belongs in
the core distribution of OpenSSL or not, but if people think that is the
place for it to go, feel free. Otherwise I'll probably just put it up for
download from one of Aventail's web servers and just have mod_ssl reference
"Salz, Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>How are you going to handle multiple OUs? In the case where a certificate
> >>contains 4 multiple OUs but a user DN only contains one of those 4?
>
> Shouldn't the user DN exactly match the "subject" field from the cert?
> If not, when and why not?
>It won't always be the case that your directory structure will map
>_exactly_ to your certificate heirarchy.
So you need a general filtering of subjectDN to LDAPDN, I guess.
We've come across this issue. Our circumstances are a little different
from yours, since the product (here) is a repositor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William M. Perry) writes:
> Here is the LDAP cert validation code. I do not know if this belongs in
> the core distribution of OpenSSL or not, but if people think that is the
> place for it to go, feel free. Otherwise I'll probably just put it up for
> download from one of Av
"Salz, Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >It won't always be the case that your directory structure will map
> >_exactly_ to your certificate heirarchy.
>
> So you need a general filtering of subjectDN to LDAPDN, I guess. We've
> come across this issue. Our circumstances are a little differen
i didn't get the attachment correctly,...
can you repost it or send it to me directly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
William M. Perry wrote:
> Here is the LDAP cert validation code. I do not know if this belongs in
> the core distribution of OpenSSL or not, but if people think that is the
> place for it to
# make
making all in crypto...
make[1]: Entering directory
`/opt1/staff/itssd/src/apachedir/openssl-0.9.3a/crypto'
echo "#define DATE \"`date`\"" >date.h
gcc -I. -I../include -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mv8
-Wall -DB_ENDIAN -DCFLAGS="\"gcc -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -O3
-fomit-fra
BSD/OS 4.0 uses ELF objects and the ELF-compatible assembler. The options
for FreeBSD-ELF work OK for BSD/OS 4, so here are tweaks to the 0.9.3a config
and Configure.
It turns out that BSD/OS reports that it's an i386 regardless of what the CPU
really is, so I made the script always believe tha
The default random pool seeding in openssl is pretty weak. It mixes up
the pool with MD5 pretty well, but there's really very little random data
put into the pool to start with. On linux it will use /dev/random and on
MS Windows it will use the current screen contents (not very random), but
othe
You wrote:
> From: Super-User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 12:59:39 -0100
> Subject: Big problem with make(compile openssl-0.9.3a)
>
>
> HEllo I am in Paris
> >
> > when I tape "./config -t" I see:
> >
> > gcc version 2.8.x
> >
15 matches
Mail list logo
