[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> We are looking for PC, Mac or Unix encryption programmers to help on an
> internet project on a full-time or consulting basis. We're located in New
> York City but work can be done off site. If anyone's interested please
> email me at the above address.
>
> Regards,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 08:36:38PM -0500, Andrew Gray wrote:
>> cd out32dll /*or whatever your output directory may be*/
>> ..\ms\test
In the VC++ section, it says
> cd out32dll
> ..\ms\test
The
> cd out
> ..\ms\test
is for Mingw32.
__
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 07:43:58PM +0100, Niels Poppe wrote:
> The intended audience here should be able to figure out the correct
> MANPATH
> or man switches, however.
Hopefully. There are quite a few name conflicts, that's why we install
the manpages in the openssl directory rather than direc
>> I see someone already got the signed/unsigned warning treated as error
>> due to /WX in /ssl/s3_pkt.c line 849
>Did a quick compile on both NT4 and Win98. Got the same warning with /WX.
>Daniel
declare n as unsigned around line 709/710 in s3_pkt.c if memory serves me
correctly. That'll fix
Ooops. Mailed too fast.
>
> 1. rename passwd.1 to passwd.1ssl
> 2. insist on installing it in /usr/local/man/man1
> 3. insist on keeping manpages under $SSLDIR/man (hmm, thats /usr for me)
> 4. rename the command (passwd_hash, ...?)
Same problem arises with man3/rand.3
I'll rename to rand.3ssl
Updating a linux rpm build, following 'standard' filesystem conventions
leads to a conflict of /usr/man/man1/passwd.1 being owned by another pkg
:(
One could
1. rename passwd.1 to passwd.1ssl
2. insist on installing it in /usr/local/man/man1
3. insist on keeping manpages under $SSLDIR/man (hmm,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eugene Levy
> Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2000 4:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Adding new cipher suites to TLS with 256+ bit session keys.
>
>
> Does any one know if any of the proposed ciph
> I see someone already got the signed/unsigned warning treated as error
> due to /WX in /ssl/s3_pkt.c line 849
Did a quick compile on both NT4 and Win98. Got the same warning with /WX.
Daniel
__
The OpenSA Project
