Hey there,
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> >
> > From: Ian Upright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > ian-list> What is the advantage of a named socket? Why not just use
> > ian-list> an ordinary TCP/IP socket?
> >
> > Port space. What random port do
Tom Schuring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> are there any examples around of how to use the s/mime capability of openSSL
> ?
`man smime', search for EXAMPLES
__
OpenSSL Project http:/
Hallo,
could it be possible to add the domainComponent (defined in RFC 2247)
to OpenSSL ?
#define SN_domainComponent "DC"
#define LN_domainComponent "domainComponent"
#define NID_domainComponent181
#define OBJ_domainComponent0L,9L,2342L,19200300L,100L,1L,25L
By
This is probably not an issue for the Dev team to look at (apologies to the
Dev team if I'm over stepping them). Please review the following message
thread for more information.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-dev&m=96637531430457&w=2
Bill Browning
-Original Message--
When I try to revoke a certificate using Windows NT, I get a problem.
The "index.txt" file is renamed to "index.txt.old", a new file "index.txt.new"
is created, but then failed to be renamed to "index.txt".
I'm almost sure that the reason is that "index.txt.new" is not closed when the
rename
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
> > Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, if you want to get something is writing from BXA itself you
> > > > > can request a written opinion from them as to whether or not the
> > > > > concerns of the OpenSSL develo
Rich Salz wrote:
>
> > ??? Crypto export was once legal, surely? If we go back far enough, that
> > is.
>
> Sure. And if you could travel back in time, you could export.
>
> If you did something at time t0 that was legal, and the law was changed at t1
> to make it illegal, then you're okay. A
> They can pass a law that makes future actions illegal, of course. So,
> they can change the _future_ status of OpenSSL, once it has been
> "infected".
>
But how does that affect anyone?
five years ago it was illegal to export OpenSSL after it was imported
into the U.S. I completely agree tha
>
> As I keep saying, this is not my concern, it is the potential
> restriction on _future_ use of OpenSSL by U.S. citizens that concerns
> me.
The U.S. government cannot tell a U.S. company or citizen that it
cannot import OpenSSL. The laws that are being used to control
exports cannot be appl
This should read
U.S. Constitution Article I Section 9
> U.S. Constitution Section 9
>
> "No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
>
> The government may not pass a law today that changes the rules of
> yesterday.
Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software De
From: Goetz Babin-Ebell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Done, but with another nid.
gbe> could it be possible to add the domainComponent (defined in RFC 2247)
gbe> to OpenSSL ?
gbe>
gbe>
gbe> #define SN_domainComponent "DC"
gbe> #define LN_domainComponent "domainComponent"
gbe> #define NID
>As I keep saying, this is not my concern, it is the potential
>restriction on _future_ use of OpenSSL by U.S. citizens that concerns
>me.
Could you please explain this? Are you saying that new rules might say
"and if it had any US source it's doulby-illegal?" I just don't
understand at all how
Dear all,
Does OpenSSL support the Palm environment? If not, is there any
people working on this?
Best Regards
Ray
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
13 matches
Mail list logo
