Re: The cost of pthread-mutexes or corresponding...

2000-12-17 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Dr S N Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drh> I can see a couple of ways to handle this. One is to let the callbacks drh> handle everything: add an extra argument that passes the address of the drh> structure associated with the lock and let them use it as an opaque ID drh> and handle a lock pool

Re: The cost of pthread-mutexes or corresponding...

2000-12-17 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rsalz> What is the problem you are trying to solve? Who has asked for it? The problems is operations on one object locking out operations on separate objects of the same type (thus making the locking needless in that sense). I have asked for it quite some ti

FWD: MORE INFO ON THE PHONE SERVICE

2000-12-17 Thread 9OLf1T9m2
You Are Receiveing This Again, Due To Another Typo In The Last Web Address. $99 Flatrate Longdistance STATE TO STATE / UNLIMITED CALLS GET RID OF THOSE HUGE LONG DISTANCE BILLS. DOESN'T TAKE AWAY FOCUS FROM YOUR PRIMARY PROGRAM!! SO... GET YOUR WHOLE DOWNLINE ON IT FOR RAPID GROWTH IN YOUR CURR

FWD: FROM JOHN

2000-12-17 Thread 92fGKk9ZU
CHECK THIS OUT. JOHN SENT IT TO ME, I THOUGHT YOU WOULD BE INTERESTED! HTTP://www.geocities.com/newestpage5543/ipb.html TO BE REMOVED FROM ALL FUTURE EMAILS, SIMPLY REPLY WITH "REMOVE" IN THE SUBJECT LINE __ OpenSSL Pr

Information regarding your software

2000-12-17 Thread mark lifman
Hi   I'm interested in setting up a gambling site in South Africa.I'm looking for something similar to ParadisePoker.com .Can you advise me on how to go about getting the necessary software from your company and what else you have to offer regarding software support. Kind regards Mark Lifman

[STATUS] OpenSSL (Sun 17-Dec-2000)

2000-12-17 Thread OpenSSL Project
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at __ $Date: 2000/12/13 18:21:47 $ DEVELOPMENT STATE o OpenSSL 0.9.7: Under development... o OpenSSL 0.9.6: Released on September 24th, 2000 o OpenSSL 0.9.5a: Released on April

Re: help

2000-12-17 Thread Geoff Thorpe
Hi there, On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, [iso-8859-1] dilip kumar wrote: [snip] > i am running a daeomon using stunnel version 3.8p4 > ,but give the following output with some in generating > random numbers [snip] > i also tried to generate random number file with open > ssl with rand command . this c

Re: Missing functions

2000-12-17 Thread Dr S N Henson
Gisle Vanem wrote: > > The 16-december snapshot fails to link because of missing functions: > DSA_SIG_new, i2d_DSA_SIG and DSA_SIG_free. Where should these be defined? > Please CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] since I'm not subscribed to the list. > Is this under Windows? If so then that is quite possible

Re: The cost of pthread-mutexes or corresponding...

2000-12-17 Thread Dan Kegel
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > rsalz> What is the problem you are trying to solve? Who has asked for it? > > The problems is operations on one object locking out operations on > separate objects of the same type (thus making the locking needless in > that sense). I have asked for it qui

Re: The cost of pthread-mutexes or corresponding...

2000-12-17 Thread Rich Salz
> To play devil's advocate, why don't we get rid of all locks in OpenSSL? Because, as we found out (back when my team first contributed the locking code to SSLeay), if you only have the granularity of a single "openssl lock", then only a single thread can do SSL_write. That locking hierarchy is

Licensing debate on SlashDot

2000-12-17 Thread Jeffrey Altman
For those who want to take part in the on going debate about licensing conflicts applied to OpenSource software http://slashdot.org/articles/00/12/17/1751202.shtml Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer C-Kermit 7.1 Alpha available The Kermit Project @ Columbia University includes Se

Re: The cost of pthread-mutexes or corresponding...

2000-12-17 Thread Dan Kegel
Rich Salz wrote: > > > To play devil's advocate, why don't we get rid of all locks in OpenSSL? > > Because, as we found out (back when my team first contributed the locking code > to SSLeay), if you only have the granularity of a single "openssl lock", then > only a single thread can do SSL_writ