[STATUS] OpenSSL (Sun 14-Jan-2001)

2001-01-14 Thread OpenSSL Project
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at __ $Date: 2001/01/12 14:06:26 $ DEVELOPMENT STATE o OpenSSL 0.9.7: Under development... o OpenSSL 0.9.6a: Bugfix release -- under development... o OpenSSL 0.9.6: Released on Se

Re: problem with basicConstraints...

2001-01-14 Thread Dr S N Henson
Rodney Thayer wrote: > > I've got a certificate coming out of Openssl (0.9.6) that has > a basicConstraints field with an empty sequence when I do > > basicConstraints=CA:FALSE > > where is that parsed? I want to look at the code. I think it's > supposed to be a sequence of a zero. > > was

Re: subjectAltName extension problem (email:copy bug ?)

2001-01-14 Thread Dr S N Henson
Massimiliano Pala wrote: > > Hi, > > Probably there is a bug in the subjectAltName setting and the > email:copy option. I have in the config file the line: > > subjectAltName=email:copy > > And when Issuing a new certificate I get an Empty AltName ext. > I have also tried modifying the

subjectAltName extension problem (email:copy bug ?)

2001-01-14 Thread Massimiliano Pala
Hi, Probably there is a bug in the subjectAltName setting and the email:copy option. I have in the config file the line: subjectAltName=email:copy And when Issuing a new certificate I get an Empty AltName ext. I have also tried modifying the extention: subjectAltName=email:copy

RE: Question!

2001-01-14 Thread Rafâa TAHAR
I want to tell ya thanks Mr Sean Walton, As i said i'm novice in security issue, and our project consists of the development of a cipher algorithm (which is under test now), but my goal is not to stay looking at this algorithm but to making it useful, and why not in the SSL. If it's not the

RE: Question!

2001-01-14 Thread Rafâa TAHAR
Ok may be my own cipher algorith contains holes in security, but as u know when people listen the word "open source" there are a little bit afraid about the security issues. But if the SSL allows the developper to include his own cipher algorithm this can be a good argument. P.S: sorry if my engl

Re: Bug Report in PKCS8 Key handling

2001-01-14 Thread Dr S N Henson
Dr S N Henson wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hi all > > > > I had been in trouble in reading PKCS8 Private Key > > > > by calling PEM_read_bio_PrivateKey(bp,NULL,NULL,pass) > > > > I finally found that p12_key.c PKCS12_key_gen_asc following function should be >replace by > > > > i