This time it really is my reply and not Richard's :-)
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Ben Laurie wrote:
> I think you have some weird kind of aesthetics. A change is a change,
> and it may was well be a clear one - adding a 1 on the end doesn't make
> it clear why a non-standard name was used. Prepending a
Please excuse this somewhat naive question.
Would it make sense to integrate additional cryptography into OpenSSL's
libcrypto? Would it be useful to have AES and Twofish, a TIGER hash, etc? Is
the OpenSSL project desirous of (clearly, among other things) being *the*
cross-platform crypto toolkit?
Herbal V: An Incredible All-Natural Healthy Alternative To Va
Herbal V is the All Natural Approach to Male Virility,
Vitality and Pleasure.
Available N o w !
Welcome to the New Sexual Revolution.
It's the all natural male potency and pleasure pill that men
everywhere are buzzing
Geoff Thorpe wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Richard's standard mail address is on sick-leave due to some server hardware
> failures. He's asked me to forward this to the list on his behalf (ie. the
> response is his, not mine, but I agree with what he's said anyhow).
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, [iso-885
> > appro> (or at least 'rm libcrypto.a')
> >
> > Have you actually tried that?
'rm libcrypto.a' only or complete build and test on Alpha Linux? I've
tried complete build on Redhat 6.2 for Alpha last night and it worked
fine with inline assembler (the one I wrote about in "BN on Alpha"
message)!
> appro> And something for VMS for Alpha users to think about:
> appro>
> appro> > 'apps/openssl speed rsa' exhibits 6 (six) times performance
> appro> > improvement over the original VMS bignum implementation.
> appro>
> appro> The "original VMS bignum" is 32-bit VAX code which gets compiled by
>
Hi there,
Richard's standard mail address is on sick-leave due to some server hardware
failures. He's asked me to forward this to the list on his behalf (ie. the
response is his, not mine, but I agree with what he's said anyhow).
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, [iso-8859-1] Götz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> [EMAI
Hi,
Here's a patch to the spec file from beta2, this fixes a build-time
problem on my Redhat 6.2 (+updates) systems (and probably other versions
as well) which results in /usr/lib/libssl.so, and /usr/lib/libssl.so.x
being copies of /usr/lib/libssl.so.x.y.z instead of symbolic links. The
patc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> levitte 29-Mar-2001 09:45:09
>
> Modified:crypto/des Tag: OpenSSL_0_9_6-stable xcbc_enc.c speed.c
> pcbc_enc.c ofb_enc.c ofb64enc.c ncbc_enc.c
> ede_cbcm_enc.c ecb_enc.c des_opts.c des_enc.c des.h
>