Hello everybody...
I got some problem.
i tried to test a simple server-client programming for message
exchange using openssl.
I got a error message in SSL_accept() at the server
side,
and SSL_connect() at the client side
please help me..
here are my environment,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:57:21AM +, a y wrote:
HMTL-gibberish...
This indicates that there is a b missing in an `fopen(...,w)' that
should read `fopen(...,wb)', such that a LF is transformed to CR/LF.
I suppose you are running OpenSSL on a Windows platform. Before I start
tracing through
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 01:05:32PM -0700, Tom Vaughan wrote:
We've researched this[1] problem further and have found that on occasion,
in the Server Hello, in response to a request to resume a session, the MAC
is bad. We've now seen this problem with both IE and Netscape. This appears
to only
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:20:17AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:57:21AM +, a y wrote:
HMTL-gibberish...
This indicates that there is a b missing in an `fopen(...,w)' that
should read `fopen(...,wb)', such that a LF is transformed to CR/LF.
I suppose you are
I am programming the simple Server-Client message exchange
program using OpenSSL.
but i encountered this error message.
Error message :
Server
"SSL_ERROR_SSL",
"error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:no shared
cipher"
Client
"SSL_ERROR_SSL",
"error:14077410:SSL
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:29:26PM +0900, Kukmin, Han wrote:
I am programming the simple Server-Client message exchange program using OpenSSL.
but i encountered this error message.
Error message :
Server
SSL_ERROR_SSL,
error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:no shared cipher
OpenSSL version: 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001
platform: solaris-sparcv8-cc
This concerns not an actual bug in compilation or function but an annoying
deviation from the standards of shared library versioning. All the bugfix
subversions of 0.9.6{,a,b} have the same extension lib...so.0.9.6 but are
not
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:36:22PM +0200, Hans Werner Strube wrote:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001
platform: solaris-sparcv8-cc
This concerns not an actual bug in compilation or function but an annoying
deviation from the standards of shared library versioning. All the bugfix
subversions
Hello,
I need some help regarding mmh amd mmh-mac. Any help is appreciated:
* what is exactly the difference between mmh amd mmh-mac?
* Does openssl support mmh amd mmh-mac? if not, is there any public source
available for these?
Thanks, Jim
From: Hans Werner Strube [EMAIL PROTECTED]
strube OpenSSL version: 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001
strube platform: solaris-sparcv8-cc
strube This concerns not an actual bug in compilation or function but
strube an annoying deviation from the standards of shared library
strube versioning. All the bugfix
From: Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lutz.Jaenicke It is correct in the sense that using the same name
Lutz.Jaenicke (0.9.6) for different versions, that are not binary
Lutz.Jaenicke compatible, does not make sense. We'll have to keep
Lutz.Jaenicke this in mind for the 0.9.7 and later
Pardon me for barging in, but I just thought a link to the actual paper,
courtesy of NEC's excellent Citeseer service, might come in handy:
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/8352.html
Is there a specific reason you're looking into using MMH specifically as
opposed to UMAC? (Halevi, Krawczyk et al):
Perhaps, I'll produce some actual numbers using OpenSSL and
both implementations to prove my case.
Note and respect that OpenSSL is cross-platform toolkit
meaning that we might face and resolve a trade-off.
Totally understood. OpenSSL should work well on all the
platforms it
13 matches
Mail list logo
