On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 03:23:12PM -0400, Howard Lum -- Customer Engineering wrote:
1. Error codes 10 and 11 are reversed in the verify(1) man page.
Will be fixed in a minute.
2. Lines in the verify(1) man page wrap to the *previous* line for
error codes 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16,
in file /crypto/engine/eng_table.c
on line 137 missing pointer before cleanup!
wrong:
int engine_table_register(ENGINE_TABLE **table, ENGINE_CLEANUP_CB cleanup,
ENGINE *e, const int *nids, int num_nids, int setdefault)
correct:
int engine_table_register(ENGINE_TABLE **table, ENGINE_CLEANUP_CB
Hi there,
Thanks!
Of course, I'm wondering to myself, how the hell didn't "gcc" pick this up
before now?
Cheers,
Geoff
On Monday 08 October 2001 09:39, Martin Szotkowski wrote:
in file /crypto/engine/eng_table.c
on line 137 missing pointer before cleanup!
wrong:
int
Geoff,
more bugs are in engine code.
1. When I compile openssl on Windows (W2k), errors are on lines where is
return engine_table_register(XXX_table,
engine_unregister_all_XXX, e, dummy_nid, 1, 0);
second parameter has bad type, I put there (ENGINE_CLEANUP_CB *), but I
don't know if is it
ÈôҪȡÏû£¬Çë»Ø¸´: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
¹ú¼Ò¾¼ÃóÒ×ίԱ»á
¹ØÓÚ¾Ù°ìͶ×ÊÏîÄ¿ÆÀ¹ÀÓëÏîÄ¿¹ÜÀí¸ß¼¶Åàѵ°àµÄ֪ͨ
Åà½Ì[2001]041ºÅ
¸÷ÓйØÆóÒµ£º
Hi there,
On Monday 08 October 2001 11:21, Martin Szotkowski wrote:
Geoff,
more bugs are in engine code.
1. When I compile openssl on Windows (W2k), errors are on lines where is
return engine_table_register(XXX_table,
engine_unregister_all_XXX, e, dummy_nid, 1, 0);
second parameter
Hi,
I found inconsistent definitions for the following three SSL APIs
in symhacks.h and ssl.h.
SYMHACKS.H
#define SSL_get_ex_data_X509_STORE_CTX_idx SSL_get_ex_d_X509_STORE_CTX_idx
#define
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
shinagawa I found inconsistent definitions for the following three SSL APIs
shinagawa in symhacks.h and ssl.h.
I assume that we're talkong OpenSSL 0.9.6b here, yes?
shinagawa
shinagawa
I would say an almost immediate release of 0.9.6c would be appropriate, since
there have been a number of corrections in that branch, and that would stop
the need for people to do all their tests all over again after having worked
with 0.9.6b for a while (0.9.7 would most probably require
Thanks for the reply.
Yes, I'm working on 0.9.6b. After checking the latest ssl.h in CVS,
I've noticed that the defitions in ssl.h is dropped. So this has already been
fixed.
-Taka
shinagawa I found inconsistent definitions for the following three SSL APIs
shinagawa in symhacks.h and
According to the doc the fields p, q, dmp1, dmq1 and iqmp
in the RSA structure may be NULL in private keys but the
function i2d_RSAPrivateKey() calls BN_num_bits() with each
field of the argument RSA* a. And BN_num_bits() cannot handle
a NULL argument. So, either BN_num_bits() or
Ajay Nerurkar wrote:
According to the doc the fields p, q, dmp1, dmq1 and iqmp
in the RSA structure may be NULL in private keys but the
function i2d_RSAPrivateKey() calls BN_num_bits() with each
field of the argument RSA* a. And BN_num_bits() cannot handle
a NULL argument. So, either
Michael Sierchio wrote:
Ajay Nerurkar wrote:
According to the doc the fields p, q, dmp1, dmq1 and iqmp
in the RSA structure may be NULL in private keys but the
function i2d_RSAPrivateKey() calls BN_num_bits() with each
field of the argument RSA* a. And BN_num_bits() cannot handle
a
Hello,
On Monday 08 October 2001 11:54, Martin Szotkowski wrote:
all are tested on W2k with VC++ 7.0 (maybe this is problem (:-))
1)
in /crypto/evp/makefile
on line 23 are wrong:
TEST=evp_test.c evptests.txt
but this create in global makefile with evptests.txt.c!
correct:
all are tested on W2k with VC++ 7.0 (maybe this is problem (:-))
1)
in /crypto/evp/makefile
on line 23 are wrong:
TEST=evp_test.c evptests.txt
but this create in global makefile with evptests.txt.c!
correct:
TEST=evp_test.c
2)
/apps/speed.c on line 86
/apps/s_time.c on line 84
error:
#include
Geoff Thorpe wrote:
Hi there,
Thanks!
Of course, I'm wondering to myself, how the hell didn't gcc pick this up
before now?
Because a function argument can only be a pointer to a function, I
presume.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
There is no limit to what a man
16 matches
Mail list logo
