Platform
RedHat Linux 6.2 (i386)
gcc 2.95.3
OpenSSL Version
===
0.9.6c
Problem Description
===
Calls to PEM_write_PKCS8PrivateKey() using a custom password collecting
function fail, in that subsequent calls to PEM_read_PrivateKey() using the
correct password
Hi!
Can you please clarify me on the following.
It's known and obvious that DES is no more strong.
I am curious about when OpenSSL librarys start supporting AES cipher instead of DES?
Best Regards.
Park Jae-Don
Enpia Systems
OS: win 2000
Can I use Korean when I specify a distinguished
name for some request?
If I create the request with differen tool and is
CN=¸¶¾ß, but not openssl req commandt ool,
then the request is signed by openssl x509
normaly.
When I use the command openssl x509 -subject, It
prints:
I want to use "req" with UTF8?
From the dociment it's seems that UTF8 can be used
only with 0.9.7 version.
So I wonder where I can get it?
Hi,
I want to report an openssl shared library versioning problem (ix86-linux).
Recently I have built and installed openssh-3.0.2p1 (using a shared library
version of libcrypto), because the former version had some security holes.
Before doing so I have upgraded from openssl-0.9.6a to 0.9.6c.
From: Peter Breitenlohner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
peb If, on the other hand, the libraries from 0.9.6a and 0.9.6c are
peb binary compatible they certainly deserve the same soname, but
peb then ssh shouln't be able to notice the difference.
They are binary compatible. I suggest you look in the
From: Peter Breitenlohner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
peb Now ssh may be a bit oversensitive, but certainly should protect
peb itself against incompatible library versions.
Of course, and considering we keep OpenSSL binary compatible between
patch levels, the test could be performed like this:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:55:28PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
From: Peter Breitenlohner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
peb If, on the other hand, the libraries from 0.9.6a and 0.9.6c are
peb binary compatible they certainly deserve the same soname, but
peb then ssh shouln't be able to
From: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jorton Does the CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS increment (and renumbering of
jorton CRYPTO_LOCK_*) break binary compatibility? I see mod_ssl is
jorton allocating a static array sized by CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS... not
jorton sure if this is common practice.
It would. That's why the
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:52:53PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
From: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jorton Does the CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS increment (and renumbering of
jorton CRYPTO_LOCK_*) break binary compatibility? I see mod_ssl is
jorton allocating a static array sized by
Thus spake ¹ÚÀçµ·:
Can you please clarify me on the following.
It's known and obvious that DES is no more strong.
I am curious about when OpenSSL librarys start supporting AES cipher
instead of DES?
0.9.6c (the latest public release) has primitive support for AES
(Rijndael). 0.9.7 will
Thus spake Maya:
I want to use req with UTF8?
From the dociment it's seems that UTF8 can be used only with 0.9.7 version.
So I wonder where I can get it?
0.9.7 hasn't been released yet. In the meantime, you can experiment
with the snapshots or CVS tree.
S
--
Stephen Sprunk So
From: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jorton On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:52:53PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
jorton It would. That's why the function CRYPTO_num_locks() exists.
jorton
jorton It's unfortunate that CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS is exported...
jorton
jorton Have we changed
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:52:36PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
From: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jorton On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:52:53PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
jorton It would. That's why the function CRYPTO_num_locks() exists.
jorton
jorton
From: Stephen Sprunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stephen 0.9.6c (the latest public release) has primitive support for
stephen AES (Rijndael).
Really? Really really? Have you looked?
stephen 0.9.7 will have much more robust support.
That's true.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL
Thus spake Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker:
From: Stephen Sprunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stephen 0.9.6c (the latest public release) has primitive support for
stephen AES (Rijndael).
Really? Really really? Have you looked?
I've got *way* too many different copies of openssl on my machine.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- libtool finally annoyed me too much, so I'm nuking it,
Huzzah!
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert
17 matches
Mail list logo