PEM_write_PKCS8PrivateKey bug report and solution

2002-01-10 Thread Dan S. Camper
Platform RedHat Linux 6.2 (i386) gcc 2.95.3 OpenSSL Version === 0.9.6c Problem Description === Calls to PEM_write_PKCS8PrivateKey() using a custom password collecting function fail, in that subsequent calls to PEM_read_PrivateKey() using the correct password

When do OpenSSL support AES cipher?

2002-01-10 Thread
Hi! Can you please clarify me on the following. It's known and obvious that DES is no more strong. I am curious about when OpenSSL librarys start supporting AES cipher instead of DES? Best Regards. Park Jae-Don Enpia Systems

Can I use Korean when I specify a distinguished name for some request? OS: Won 2000

2002-01-10 Thread Maya
OS: win 2000 Can I use Korean when I specify a distinguished name for some request? If I create the request with differen tool and is CN=¸¶¾ß, but not openssl req commandt ool, then the request is signed by openssl x509 normaly. When I use the command openssl x509 -subject, It prints:

Where can I get the the 0.9.7 version?

2002-01-10 Thread Maya
I want to use "req" with UTF8? From the dociment it's seems that UTF8 can be used only with 0.9.7 version. So I wonder where I can get it?

An openssl shared library versioning problem

2002-01-10 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
Hi, I want to report an openssl shared library versioning problem (ix86-linux). Recently I have built and installed openssh-3.0.2p1 (using a shared library version of libcrypto), because the former version had some security holes. Before doing so I have upgraded from openssl-0.9.6a to 0.9.6c.

Re: An openssl shared library versioning problem

2002-01-10 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Peter Breitenlohner [EMAIL PROTECTED] peb If, on the other hand, the libraries from 0.9.6a and 0.9.6c are peb binary compatible they certainly deserve the same soname, but peb then ssh shouln't be able to notice the difference. They are binary compatible. I suggest you look in the

Re: An openssl shared library versioning problem

2002-01-10 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Peter Breitenlohner [EMAIL PROTECTED] peb Now ssh may be a bit oversensitive, but certainly should protect peb itself against incompatible library versions. Of course, and considering we keep OpenSSL binary compatible between patch levels, the test could be performed like this:

Re: An openssl shared library versioning problem

2002-01-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:55:28PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: From: Peter Breitenlohner [EMAIL PROTECTED] peb If, on the other hand, the libraries from 0.9.6a and 0.9.6c are peb binary compatible they certainly deserve the same soname, but peb then ssh shouln't be able to

Re: An openssl shared library versioning problem

2002-01-10 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] jorton Does the CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS increment (and renumbering of jorton CRYPTO_LOCK_*) break binary compatibility? I see mod_ssl is jorton allocating a static array sized by CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS... not jorton sure if this is common practice. It would. That's why the

Re: An openssl shared library versioning problem

2002-01-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:52:53PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: From: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] jorton Does the CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS increment (and renumbering of jorton CRYPTO_LOCK_*) break binary compatibility? I see mod_ssl is jorton allocating a static array sized by

Re: When do OpenSSL support AES cipher?

2002-01-10 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Thus spake ¹ÚÀçµ·: Can you please clarify me on the following. It's known and obvious that DES is no more strong. I am curious about when OpenSSL librarys start supporting AES cipher instead of DES? 0.9.6c (the latest public release) has primitive support for AES (Rijndael). 0.9.7 will

Re: Where can I get the the 0.9.7 version?

2002-01-10 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Thus spake Maya: I want to use req with UTF8? From the dociment it's seems that UTF8 can be used only with 0.9.7 version. So I wonder where I can get it? 0.9.7 hasn't been released yet. In the meantime, you can experiment with the snapshots or CVS tree. S -- Stephen Sprunk So

Re: An openssl shared library versioning problem

2002-01-10 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] jorton On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:52:53PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: jorton It would. That's why the function CRYPTO_num_locks() exists. jorton jorton It's unfortunate that CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS is exported... jorton jorton Have we changed

Re: An openssl shared library versioning problem

2002-01-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:52:36PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: From: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] jorton On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:52:53PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: jorton It would. That's why the function CRYPTO_num_locks() exists. jorton jorton

Re: When do OpenSSL support AES cipher?

2002-01-10 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Stephen Sprunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] stephen 0.9.6c (the latest public release) has primitive support for stephen AES (Rijndael). Really? Really really? Have you looked? stephen 0.9.7 will have much more robust support. That's true. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL

Re: When do OpenSSL support AES cipher?

2002-01-10 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Thus spake Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker: From: Stephen Sprunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] stephen 0.9.6c (the latest public release) has primitive support for stephen AES (Rijndael). Really? Really really? Have you looked? I've got *way* too many different copies of openssl on my machine. I

Re: cvs commit: openssl/demos/tunala INSTALL Makefile.am configure.in tunala.c

2002-01-10 Thread Ben Laurie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - libtool finally annoyed me too much, so I'm nuking it, Huzzah! Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert