Greetings,
after getting tired of supporting diferent SSL/SSH environments for
Solaris 2.6, 7 and 8, and getting too anxious while reading that Solaris 9
was to provide a /dev/[u]random device and that openssl 0.9.7 (with
support for polling prngd) was on the way.
i got this patch backporting
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:42:24
>+0200, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> vinschen> I don't understand what this patch has to do with Cygwin since Cygwin
> vinschen> supports symbolc links since
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:53:06AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:42:24
>+0200, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> vinschen> I don't understand what this patch has to do with Cygwin since Cygwin
> vinschen> supports
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:42:24
+0200, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
vinschen> I don't understand what this patch has to do with Cygwin since Cygwin
vinschen> supports symbolc links since years now. Could you explain, please?
Note that Doug's changes sh
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:09:18PM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> Here is a revised patch for DOS (and other platforms that don't
> support symbolic links). With this patch openssl-0.9.7 snapshot from
> 19 April 2002 compiles without problems. Make test show no errors,
> except inability to load 'ra
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 20 Apr
2002 14:44:19 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dkaufman> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
dkaufman>
dkaufman> > dkaufman> The problem is that util/mklink.pl only works with algorithms
that
dkaufman> > dka
Here is a revised patch for DOS (and other platforms that don't
support symbolic links). With this patch openssl-0.9.7 snapshot from
19 April 2002 compiles without problems. Make test show no errors,
except inability to load 'random state' (related to no built-in
method of gathering entropy). I al
Here is a revised patch for DOS (and other platforms that don't
support symbolic links). With this patch openssl-0.9.6d-beta1 compiles
without problems. Make test show no errors, except inability to load
'random state' (related to no built-in method of gathering entropy).
I also built on Cygwin 1.
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> dkaufman> The problem is that util/mklink.pl only works with algorithms that
> dkaufman> are included in the build. It is called from the makefile in each
>
> In that case, it's the test programs that need to be changed so as not
> to g
> Solaris 7 solaris-sparcv8-gcc OK
[ etc. snipped ]
HP/UX 11hpux-parisc-cc OK
HP/UX 11hpux64-parisc-ccOK
(Our HP/UX machines are one rolled-up patch release back from current.)
--
Harald Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"It takes
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 20 Apr 2002 19:09:42 +0200
(CDT), "Jan M. Danielsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
os2> -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
os2> Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i OS/2 for non-commercial use
os2> Comment: PGP 5.0 for OS/2
os2>
os2> mQGiBDnLTLwRBADdRno67emIMNR5680X08
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 20 Apr
2002 09:51:44 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dkaufman> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
[...]
dkaufman> > I understand the reasons behind several things you do, like the
dkaufman> > symlink hackery. Howe
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i OS/2 for non-commercial use
Comment: PGP 5.0 for OS/2
mQGiBDnLTLwRBADdRno67emIMNR5680X08aat4af79fKyfOIfCmu0a+pELWRObPx
vLwpw9KfmmNNaRh/XHwHPPiMmrv18d2+ovFN41IhLsGWA2wTDsRwH8ZmMyH5uTTB
HPUzReVwF0WQYGIMaUmp3CWAhk1Q1RgRmYfnJ6gwTy5eFim7Je
I've tried both openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020419 and openssl-SNAP-20020419
on WIN32 (using VC++ 6).
openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020419
In order to successfully compile the library I slightly modified two files:
in s3_pkt.c there are two mismatch signed/unsigned one for the variable
extra (I
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> I've looked at the two patches you sent (relative to 0.9.6d and
> 0.9.7). Unfortunately, I believe that the 0.9.6d won't get applied,
> because of unpredictable problems that might occur. Therefore, I will
> only comment that 0.9.7 one
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:36:47PM -0400, Michael Kobar wrote:
> --- Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> >
> > The release of OpenSSL 0.9.6d is scheduled for Tuesday 2002-04-30.
> > To make sure that it will work correctly, please test this version
> > (especially on less common platforms), a
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 02:16:20PM -0700, Tim Rice wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> > The release of OpenSSL 0.9.6d is scheduled for Tuesday 2002-04-30.
> > To make sure that it will work correctly, please test this version
> > (especially on less common plat
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 05:01:02AM -0600, James Yonan wrote:
> > The following program succeeds on 0.9.6 but
> > fails on 0.9.7. It tests the feature of
> > calling EVP_CipherInit once to build
> > a key schedule, then cycling through
> > calls to EVP_CipherInit, EVP_Cip
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 04:23:19PM -0700, Nir Goldman wrote:
> I'm trying to install openssl-0.9.5 on an old AIX3.2 machine so I can
> eventually install openssh-3.1. Whenever I try to build with 'make', I
> get the following long list of errors (this is a partial list):
Latest OpenSSH require
The following success report I received as part of a private
discussion.
I can report success for 0.9.6d (normal and engine) on HP-UX 10.20
with both HP's ANSI-C and gcc-3.0.3
- Forwarded message from Bernhard Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Bravo! - Alles funktioniert out-of-the-box! Sogar a
Hi,
I'm working on openssl 0.9.6 (and SSL generally)
and trying to implement new cipher suite.
The new cipher suite will be :
SSL_RSA_WITH_ABLOCKCIPHER_CBC_SHA
What files should I create (and where to put it) ?
and which files needed to be modified.
Thank you.
--
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 20 Apr 2002
12:30:35 +0200 (CEST), Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Oops. This message was meant for Lorinczy Zsigmond only.
levitte> Hello,
levitte>
levitte> You recently sent two patches, but forgot to tell us what version of
lev
Hello,
You recently sent two patches, but forgot to tell us what version of
OpenSSL they are supposed to be applied on.
Please inform us, and we'll be able to go on with the patch.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 19 Apr 2002 18:11:49 +0200, Bernd
Matthes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hello Bernd,
I've looked at the list of errors and have made some changes that look
almost exactly like your diff (I didn't notice the attachment at
first). A few changes in the Windows s
Hello,
I'm trying to install openssl-0.9.5 on an old AIX3.2 machine so I can
eventually install openssh-3.1. Whenever I try to build with 'make', I
get the following long list of errors (this is a partial list):
making all in crypto/bn...
.
cc -I.. -I../../include -DNO_ASM -O
--- Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> The release of OpenSSL 0.9.6d is scheduled for Tuesday 2002-04-30.
> To make sure that it will work correctly, please test this version
> (especially on less common platforms), and report any problems to
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
All built with ./config
I've looked at the two patches you sent (relative to 0.9.6d and
0.9.7). Unfortunately, I believe that the 0.9.6d won't get applied,
because of unpredictable problems that might occur. Therefore, I will
only comment that 0.9.7 one.
I understand the reasons behind several things you do, like the
27 matches
Mail list logo
