On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:24:23PM -0600, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> Is it not incumbant upon the openssl.org mailing list maintainer(s) to prevent spam
>from making it onto the mailing lists? Generally speaking you will want to restrict
>posting to list members, and for lists such as openssl-announ
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:59:23PM -0400, Michael Kobar wrote:
> --- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've build with
> >
> > ./config --prefix=/usr shared no-idea no-rc5 no-mdc2
> >
> > as the Cygwin net distribution, and for testing
> > purposes with
> >
> > ./config
> >
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 24 Apr 2002
09:21:52 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Lutz.Jaenicke> Only list members are allowed to post.
Ahem, I believe openssl-users and openssl-bugs are open to all. The
former has been discussed many time, the latter should be self-ev
Solar Designer wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:09:14PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > Solar Designer wrote:
> > > This sounds like a bug to me. Noticed it last year and I've just
> > > checked that it's still not resolved in the latest snapshot.
> > >
> > > jill!solar:~/build/openssl-SNAP-20
STRTOK(3) Linux Programmer's Manual STRTOK(3)
NAME
strtok, strtok_r - extract tokens from strings
BUGS
Never use these functions.
^^
no, i'm not making this up, this is a vanilla debian woody.
On 02-04-17 12:41:35 CEST,
Solar Designer wrote:
> Thank you for working on this!
OK, try the attached patch...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
Inde
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:24:23PM -0600, Kurt Seifried wrote:
>
>> Is it not incumbant upon the openssl.org mailing list maintainer(s) to
>> prevent spam from making it onto the mailing lists? Generally speaking you
>> will want to restrict posting to
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 24 Apr 2002
>09:21:52 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Lutz.Jaenicke> Only list members are allowed to post.
>
> Ahem, I believe openssl-users and openssl-bugs are open to all. The
> former ha
I am use learning and testing CA's. I have tried to create a
self-signed CA certificate using the following:
openssl req -new -x509 -days 365 -key sample.key -out sample.crt
and this is the error message that I get. I re-built openssl and
openssh, but I still get this error. What am I doing
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:04:53PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Solar Designer wrote:
> > Thank you for working on this!
>
> OK, try the attached patch...
It's almost right, except:
> - do_fp(out, buf,inp,separator, out_bin, sigkey, sigbuf, siglen);
> + do_fp(out, buf,inp,
What is the status of support in OpenSSL for 64 bit architectures?
We are compiling our code for an Itanium box and are wondering how much
change may be required to get OpenSSL running as well.
Thanks for your feedback.
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading pr
Verdon Walker wrote:
>
> What is the status of support in OpenSSL for 64 bit architectures?
>
> We are compiling our code for an Itanium box and are wondering how much
> change may be required to get OpenSSL running as well.
It's been OK on the Alpha platform for over a year. I found and
submi
oh... on my alpha i've been consistently getting failures in the big num
test stuff for a while now...
that is using "./config" and using gcc on redhat linux 6.0? for alpha -
though iirc the compiler is more recent possibly 2.95.3?
Sean
Paul L. Allen wrote:
> Verdon Walker wrote:
>
>>What is
13 matches
Mail list logo