Re: 4/23/2002 11:59:51 PM

2002-04-24 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:24:23PM -0600, Kurt Seifried wrote: > Is it not incumbant upon the openssl.org mailing list maintainer(s) to prevent spam >from making it onto the mailing lists? Generally speaking you will want to restrict >posting to list members, and for lists such as openssl-announ

Re: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6d beta 1 testing results

2002-04-24 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:59:23PM -0400, Michael Kobar wrote: > --- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've build with > > > > ./config --prefix=/usr shared no-idea no-rc5 no-mdc2 > > > > as the Cygwin net distribution, and for testing > > purposes with > > > > ./config > > >

Re: 4/23/2002 11:59:51 PM

2002-04-24 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:21:52 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Lutz.Jaenicke> Only list members are allowed to post. Ahem, I believe openssl-users and openssl-bugs are open to all. The former has been discussed many time, the latter should be self-ev

Re: "openssl dgst" ignores read errors

2002-04-24 Thread Ben Laurie
Solar Designer wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:09:14PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > > Solar Designer wrote: > > > This sounds like a bug to me. Noticed it last year and I've just > > > checked that it's still not resolved in the latest snapshot. > > > > > > jill!solar:~/build/openssl-SNAP-20

patch for req/ca -subj (was: Re: Wrong DNs)

2002-04-24 Thread Robert Joop
STRTOK(3) Linux Programmer's Manual STRTOK(3) NAME strtok, strtok_r - extract tokens from strings BUGS Never use these functions. ^^ no, i'm not making this up, this is a vanilla debian woody. On 02-04-17 12:41:35 CEST,

Re: "openssl dgst" ignores read errors

2002-04-24 Thread Ben Laurie
Solar Designer wrote: > Thank you for working on this! OK, try the attached patch... Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff Inde

Re: 4/23/2002 11:59:51 PM

2002-04-24 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:24:23PM -0600, Kurt Seifried wrote: > >> Is it not incumbant upon the openssl.org mailing list maintainer(s) to >> prevent spam from making it onto the mailing lists? Generally speaking you >> will want to restrict posting to

Re: 4/23/2002 11:59:51 PM

2002-04-24 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 24 Apr 2002 >09:21:52 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Lutz.Jaenicke> Only list members are allowed to post. > > Ahem, I believe openssl-users and openssl-bugs are open to all. The > former ha

CA error

2002-04-24 Thread Jay States
I am use learning and testing CA's. I have tried to create a self-signed CA certificate using the following: openssl req -new -x509 -days 365 -key sample.key -out sample.crt and this is the error message that I get. I re-built openssl and openssh, but I still get this error. What am I doing

Re: "openssl dgst" ignores read errors

2002-04-24 Thread Solar Designer
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:04:53PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > Solar Designer wrote: > > Thank you for working on this! > > OK, try the attached patch... It's almost right, except: > - do_fp(out, buf,inp,separator, out_bin, sigkey, sigbuf, siglen); > + do_fp(out, buf,inp,

64 bit support

2002-04-24 Thread Verdon Walker
What is the status of support in OpenSSL for 64 bit architectures? We are compiling our code for an Itanium box and are wondering how much change may be required to get OpenSSL running as well. Thanks for your feedback. Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading pr

Re: 64 bit support

2002-04-24 Thread Paul L. Allen
Verdon Walker wrote: > > What is the status of support in OpenSSL for 64 bit architectures? > > We are compiling our code for an Itanium box and are wondering how much > change may be required to get OpenSSL running as well. It's been OK on the Alpha platform for over a year. I found and submi

Re: 64 bit support

2002-04-24 Thread Sean O'Riordain
oh... on my alpha i've been consistently getting failures in the big num test stuff for a while now... that is using "./config" and using gcc on redhat linux 6.0? for alpha - though iirc the compiler is more recent possibly 2.95.3? Sean Paul L. Allen wrote: > Verdon Walker wrote: > >>What is