[openssl.org #39] openssl-0.9.6d shared libs built on OSX *WITHOUT* .dylib extension ...

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[levitte - Thu May 30 09:06:04 2002]: You're quite right, .dylib isn't added. The reason was two-fold: 1) darwin-ppc-cc, as well as a few other targets, had the shared_extensions field misaligned, which in effet disabled having any extension at all for shared libraries. 2) support for

[openssl.org #43] Double Free Error

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri May 17 19:50:59 2002]: Installed openssl-0.9.6d source and built it locally. Built a PEM certificate for testing U of W IMAP with SSL. SSL didn't work, wouldn't accept the certificate. Discovered that code still has a double free bug that was reported back in

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-30 Thread Steven Bade
I'm not sure about the second question, but we found that the eracom engine submission was much more generic. When one of my co-workers tried to get our PKCS#11 libraries (openCryptoki) used by the Trustway module there were many issues, as well as specific calls directly to PKCs#11

Re: cvs commit: openssl/util pod2man.pl

2002-05-30 Thread Bodo Moeller
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:14:17PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: pod2man is a command line wrapper around Pod::Man these days, and depends on other Pod:: modules. Do you *really* want them to be included? If we can't update our copy of pod2man, we should at least keep the old

RE: [openssl.org #51] OpenSSL 0.9.7 -BUG - WIN32

2002-05-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Hi, That is also a working solution ! /raimo -Original Message- From: ext Richard Levitte via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 May, 2002 16:10 To: Vuonnala Raimo (NVO/Helsinki) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [openssl.org #51] OpenSSL 0.9.7 -BUG - WIN32 I think I

Re: cvs commit: openssl/util pod2man.pl

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 30 May 2002 15:27:44 +0200, Bodo Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: moeller Specifically, we'd have to test that multi-line NAME sections are moeller handled correctly; it appears this bug was fixed only recently in the moeller pod2man that comes with Perl.

Re: cvs commit: openssl/util pod2man.pl

2002-05-30 Thread Bodo Moeller
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:39:21PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Specifically, we'd have to test that multi-line NAME sections are handled correctly; it appears this bug was fixed only recently in the pod2man that comes with Perl. Hmm, I tested with doc/crypto/des.pod with the

Re: cvs commit: openssl/util pod2man.pl

2002-05-30 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:43:34PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:39:21PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Specifically, we'd have to test that multi-line NAME sections are handled correctly; it appears this bug was fixed only recently in the pod2man that

[openssl.org #56] Apparent bug in AES_ctr128_encrypt

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 26 11:34:49 2002]: The main loop from AES_ctr128_encrypt seems superficially incorrect. If any non-zero initial value is provided for *num, the first 16-*num bytes are not necessarily encrypted. You do know that AES_ctr128_encrypt() must be called with

Re: [openssl.org #12] Re: Revised DOS patch for openssl-0.9.7

2002-05-30 Thread Doug Kaufman
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: I'd like to know what state the DJGPP support is at right now. Since the large patch for DJGPP support that was sent to openssl-dev some time ago never made it into the ticket database, I'm a bit unsure about what to do with it. I

Re: [openssl.org #51] OpenSSL 0.9.7 -BUG - WIN32

2002-05-30 Thread Doug Kaufman
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: I think I should change e_os2.h so OPENSSL_SYS_MSDOS is only defined for OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN16 and OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN16. Does that seem to be a good solution, or is there something I've missed? I think you will need it for DJGPP also.

Re: cvs commit: openssl/util pod2man.pl

2002-05-30 Thread Geoff Thorpe
Hi there, Slowly catching up on some of this ticket discussion ... On Thu, 30 May 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:43:34PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote: A later comment was The pod2man which comes with perl 5.6 has the same problem. I remember having had

Re: [openssl.org #12] Re: Revised DOS patch for openssl-0.9.7

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 30 May 2002 07:54:17 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: dkaufman I'll try to review the patch this weekend and resubmit. I presume dkaufman you mean the patch for 0.9.7, or would you like the patch for 0.9.6 dkaufman resubmitted also? Thanks.

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-30 Thread afchine madjlessi
Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've just started looking at this, and I've got a couple of questions: 1. could this engine be considered a general PKCS#11 engine, or are there specific ties to Trustway. I'd prefer to see a general PKCS#11 engine. This engine is a

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-30 Thread
Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've just started looking at this, and I've got a couple of questions: 1. could this engine be considered a general PKCS#11 engine, or are there specific ties to Trustway. I'd prefer to see a general PKCS#11 engine. This engine is a

[openssl.org #51] OpenSSL 0.9.7 -BUG - WIN32

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu May 30 16:22:22 2002]: Hi again, Sorry Richard, but your suggestion just don't work: OPENSSL_SYS_MSDOS is used all over the source and in principle these #ifdefs are correct. The only thing that must be fixed is that #define MS_STATIC static (set in e_os.h)

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-30 Thread afchine madjlessi
Steven Bade [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm not sure about the second question, but we found that the eracom engine submission was much more generic. When one of my co-workers tried to get our PKCS#11 libraries (openCryptoki) used by the Trustway module there were many issues, as well as

Re: [openssl.org #43] Double Free Error

2002-05-30 Thread Harvey Wamboldt via RT
Hi, Just wanted you to know that I'm still having problems with DER format certificates. A more thorough inspection turned up additional double free errors in the same directory :( Best Rgds, -H- On Thu, 30 May 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri May 17 19:50:59

[openssl.org #57] Solaris64 sparc-v9 GCC 3.1 patch for OpenSSL 0.9.6d Configure

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
The patch is now applied and committed. Thanks! [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue May 28 20:00:46 2002]: Well, here it is... Works great for me, passed all tests. Creates a 64bit OpenSSL package for Solaris using the newly released GCC 3.1 -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #43] Double Free Error

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu May 30 19:28:13 2002]: Hi, Just wanted you to know that I'm still having problems with DER format certificates. A more thorough inspection turned up additional double free errors in the same directory :( Hmm, would you mind telling me which file it is, since

[openssl.org #52] Bug in crypto/cversion.c:84

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
This was much easier to fix than I thought. Committed and present in the next snapshot. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu May 23 16:27:27 2002]: Hi there, it seems that in line 84 in crypto/cversion.c there is a bug: eg. if you run Configure with -DDEVRANDOM=\/dev/random\ and therefore the

Re: cvs commit: openssl/util pod2man.pl

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 30 May 2002 15:05:31 +0200, Bodo Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: moeller On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:18:15PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: moeller moellerLog: moellerOur copy of pod2man.pl is old and comparatively broken, so lets remove it. moeller