Or, a more consise list with only AES,
/usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl ciphers -tls1
AES
ADH-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:
AES256-SHA:ADH-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA:
AES128-SHA
and, I don't find RSA_WITH_AES_128_SHA. Anybody have any pointers? thanks much,
bertie BTW: You never replied to the mail with subject Requiring
bertie multithreaded apps to provide dynamic locking upcalls was
bertie this because you agreed with it :-)
Not really. It's more like haven't quite had the time to really read
it, have marked it for later processing... I will
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:14:13PM -0800, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
Or, a more consise list with only AES,
/usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl ciphers -tls1
AES
ADH-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:
AES256-SHA:ADH-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA:
AES128-SHA
and, I don't
I got the error below after running make.
% cd /usr/local/src/openssl-0.9.6h
% ./config
% make
snip
ld: Undefined symbols:
_OPENSSL_cleanse
make[2]: *** [openssl] Error 1
make[1]: *** [sub_all] Error 1
/snip
Anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?
Attached is the full make report
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Dec 2002
08:24:47 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie In view of the fact that the chil engine code is only
bertie threadsafe if the dynlock callbacks are implemented, and that
bertie it is unlikely that openssl application developers will get
At 09:36 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11
Dec 2002 08:24:47 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie In view of the fact that the chil engine code is only
bertie threadsafe if the dynlock callbacks are implemented, and that
bertie
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Dec 2002
08:56:19 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie Yep, this solution works if you are an application developer
bertie wanting to use chil engine. This is not much help if you are
bertie say an Apache user who wanted to use an nCipher HSM to
At 10:00 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11
Dec 2002 08:56:19 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie Yep, this solution works if you are an application developer
bertie wanting to use chil engine. This is not much help if you are
I'll ponder and get back to you later today.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... use up
every damn register and it's really tight there. Now what would it take
to PIC-ify the code? Most likely an extra register! The one you'll be
calculating offsets from. And the problem is that there is no register
to spare ... good news are that there is only one [DES]
module that
At 10:16 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
I'll ponder and get back to you later today.
Thanks,
Bertie
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Richard Levitte wrote:
Hello Richard,
OpenSSL CVS Repository
http://cvs.openssl.org/
Server: cvs.openssl.org Name: Richard Levitte
Root: /e/openssl/cvs Email: [EMAIL
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:14:13PM -0800, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
Or, a more consise list with only AES,
/usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl ciphers -tls1
AES
ADH-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:
I've now got OpenSSL 0.6.9h compiling and testing fine using Watcom
11.0c under Win2k, as a static library with and without the optimized
assembly. In the process, I've come across a few minor problems:
.\crypto\des\ecb_enc.c(96): Warning! W201: Unreachable code
if (sizeof(DES_LONG) !=
Hi there,
* Bertie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At 10:00 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
bertie Yep, this solution works if you are an application developer
bertie wanting to use chil engine. This is not much help if you are
bertie say an Apache user who wanted to use an
In message 20021211162914.GA1042@debbie on Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:29:14 -0500, Geoff
Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
geoff Just catching up on all this, but something seems a bit strange to me
geoff about the fundamental reliance on OpenSSL-sponsored dynamic locks. The
geoff point is this: ENGINE is
Hi,
* Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The CHIL interface was once meant as some kind of general purpose
library to access certain functions in a cipher box or smart card.
For that reason, it asks for mutex callbacks exactly like OpenSSL
does (and probably for the same
I have been working on
BN assembler aided implementation that would need some benchmarking. It
should give around 3x speed-up...
Preliminary patch relative to 0.9.6h is available at
http://www.openssl.org/~appro/. Once it's confirmed to be working on
real hardware, it will be ported/merged to
18 matches
Mail list logo
