On September 27, 2004 06:01 pm, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27 Sep
> [...]
> geoff> Anyway, I don't know if anyone's got any bright ideas, but it
> geoff> seems like there should be a better way to handle this
> geoff> "setting" - eg. splitting ***_
Hi,
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 22:28, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Well, I did a grep for OpenSSLDie in the 0.9.6m tree but no result other
> than in cryptlib.c. So your answer might be true for the 0.9.7 branch,
> but not for openssl-engine-0.9.6m.
It appears the definition of OpenSSLDie in cryptl
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:42:04 -0400, Geoff Thorpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
geoff> BTW, on a related note - the logic that decides whether this
geoff> code gets built or not (independently of whether it will
geoff> operate at run-time due to autodetection) hinges off
Hello Richard,
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 20:05, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> You will find OpenSSLDie() declared in crypto.h, along with
> OPENSSL_assert(), which replaces die().
Well, I did a grep for OpenSSLDie in the 0.9.6m tree but no result other
than in cryptlib.c. So your answer migh
On September 27, 2004 03:20 pm, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27 Sep
> 2004 14:33:32 -0400, Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> geoff> Quick reaction without checking the code properly. No, I think
> geoff> the issue is that further down there
On September 27, 2004 02:02 pm, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27 Sep
> 2004 13:41:18 -0400, Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> geoff> Well eng_padlock.c is #ifdef'd out unless we are on a
> geoff> "supported" platform, so I don't think portabi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:33:32 -0400, Geoff Thorpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
geoff> Quick reaction without checking the code properly. No, I think
geoff> the issue is that further down there is other preprocessor
geoff> logic that checks whether the compiler is gcc, w
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:47:35 +0200, Leonard den
Ottolander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
leonard> Hello,
leonard>
leonard> Looking through all the patches for RHL 7.3 I noticed an oddity when
leonard> comparing against openssl-0.9.6m. Taken from RHL 7.3's
leonard> open
