[openssl.org #1026] XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED definition causes problems on AIX 5.2 with gcc 3.4.3 and openssl 0.9.7e

2005-03-18 Thread Mark Frost via RT
I'm trying to compile openssl 0.9.7e on an AIX 5.2 system. $ gcc -v Reading specs from /appl/wideacc/mfrost/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.4.3/specs Configured with: /appl/wideacc/mfrost/src/gcc-3.4.3/configure --prefix=/appl/wideacc/mfrost --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-threads=aix

[openssl.org #1027] bug report

2005-03-18 Thread Daniel Nieten via RT
While trying to build the latest version of openssl I encounterd the following error: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/export/home/opt/openssl-0.9.7e/crypto/rand' cc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_ULTRASPARC -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H

Out of the Office

2005-03-18 Thread ehodge
I am currently out of the office and will return on April 1st. If you have any technical questions or problems, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED], or Ryan Truong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Thanks, Edgar __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #1026] XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED definition causes problems on AIX 5.2 with gcc 3.4.3 and openssl 0.9.7e

2005-03-18 Thread Trent Mick
[Mark Frost via RT wrote] I'm trying to compile openssl 0.9.7e on an AIX 5.2 system. ... A look at the file that's being compiled (openssl-0.9.7e/fips/rand/fips_rand.c) shows the following at line 56: /* If we don't define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED, struct timeval won't be defined and

[PATCH] guard XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED re-definition to fix compilation on AIX 5

2005-03-18 Thread Trent Mick
A redefinition of _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED here on AIX causes the following error. cc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -O -DAIX -DB_ENDIAN -qmaxmem=16384 -c -o fips_rand.o fips_rand.c fips_rand.c, line 59.9: 1506-236 (W) Macro name _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED

[openssl.org #1026] XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED definition causes problems on AIX 5.2 with gcc 3.4.3 and openssl 0.9.7e

2005-03-18 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
Please check the last stable snapshot. I believe this issue has already been addressed. Steve. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

[openssl.org #1018] unbuffered stdin problem?

2005-03-18 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Mar 4 11:36:07 2005]: Hi, The command openssl rsa -passin stdin -noout -modulus passkey gives error unable to load Private Key 1860:error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line:./pem/pem_lib.c:637:Expecting: ANY PRIVATE KEY This is attempting to

Re: [openssl.org #1026] XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED definition causes problems on AIX 5.2 with gcc 3.4.3 and openssl 0.9.7e

2005-03-18 Thread Mark Frost via RT
Stephen, I grabbed openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20050318 and tried it. It does not appear to have the issue and builds fine. FYI. I assume this will become a 0.9.7f at some point (soon maybe)? Thanks Mark Frost Stephen Henson via RT wrote: Please check the last stable snapshot. I believe

x509.h and x509v3.h how are they different?!

2005-03-18 Thread Chevalier, Victor T.
Can someone please tell me how x509.h and x509v3.h differ, are there any important things to consider??? Does anyone have a good page to reference or point me to the right page...google is not giving very good results...Thank you.

Re: status of OpenSSL port to Win64/IA64?

2005-03-18 Thread Trent Mick
[Trent Mick wrote] [Peter Waltenberg wrote] IBM donated some large patches to OpenSSL a while back. The code was donated under the terms of the OpenSSL licence and is a patch against OpenSSL 0.9.7c. Those included support for Win64. Check the request tracker and openssl-dev mailing

RE: x509.h and x509v3.h how are they different?!

2005-03-18 Thread Chevalier, Victor T.
Is there a good book website that documents the usage? Thank you. Victor T. Chevalier General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems Office: 210-340-1041 x211 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 2:38

Getting P64-system (e.g. Win64) support into the core

2005-03-18 Thread Trent Mick
Stephen, All, I'm interested in helping (as much as I can) get P64-system (of which Win64 is one such system) support into core OpenSSL. Can you give me some pointers? I've made some progress with the old patch that IBM provided a year or so ago (http://tinyurl.com/4b8dn), as I mentioned in an

Re: [openssl.org #1018] unbuffered stdin problem?

2005-03-18 Thread kapil jain via RT
Hi Stephen, Thanks for the response. Could you let me know why is this not supported? This used to work before and since the API doens't allow it it seems to be a valid use? Thanks Kapil --- Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Mar 4 11:36:07 2005]: Hi,

Out of the Office

2005-03-18 Thread ehodge
I am currently out of the office and will return on April 1st. If you have any technical questions or problems, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED], or Ryan Truong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Thanks, Edgar __ OpenSSL Project