I'm trying to compile openssl 0.9.7e on an AIX 5.2 system.
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from
/appl/wideacc/mfrost/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.4.3/specs
Configured with: /appl/wideacc/mfrost/src/gcc-3.4.3/configure
--prefix=/appl/wideacc/mfrost --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-threads=aix
While trying to build the latest version of openssl I
encounterd the following error:
gmake[2]: Entering directory
`/export/home/opt/openssl-0.9.7e/crypto/rand'
cc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include
-DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_ULTRASPARC -DOPENSSL_THREADS
-D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
I am currently out of the office and will return on April 1st. If you have any
technical questions or problems, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED], or Ryan
Truong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Thanks, Edgar
__
OpenSSL Project
[Mark Frost via RT wrote]
I'm trying to compile openssl 0.9.7e on an AIX 5.2 system.
...
A look at the file that's being compiled
(openssl-0.9.7e/fips/rand/fips_rand.c) shows the following at line 56:
/* If we don't define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED, struct timeval won't
be defined and
A redefinition of _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED here on AIX causes the
following error.
cc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -O
-DAIX -DB_ENDIAN -qmaxmem=16384 -c -o fips_rand.o fips_rand.c
fips_rand.c, line 59.9: 1506-236 (W) Macro name _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
Please check the last stable snapshot. I believe this issue has already
been addressed.
Steve.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Mar 4 11:36:07 2005]:
Hi,
The command
openssl rsa -passin stdin -noout -modulus passkey
gives error
unable to load Private Key
1860:error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start
line:./pem/pem_lib.c:637:Expecting: ANY PRIVATE KEY
This is attempting to
Stephen,
I grabbed openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20050318 and tried it. It does not
appear to have the issue and builds fine. FYI.
I assume this will become a 0.9.7f at some point (soon maybe)?
Thanks
Mark Frost
Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
Please check the last stable snapshot. I believe
Can someone please tell me how x509.h and x509v3.h differ, are there any
important things to consider??? Does anyone have a good page to
reference or point me to the right page...google is not giving very good
results...Thank you.
[Trent Mick wrote]
[Peter Waltenberg wrote]
IBM donated some large patches to OpenSSL a while back. The code was
donated under the terms of the OpenSSL licence and is a patch against
OpenSSL 0.9.7c. Those included support for Win64. Check the request
tracker and openssl-dev mailing
Is there a good book website that documents the usage?
Thank you.
Victor T. Chevalier
General Dynamics
Advanced Information Systems
Office: 210-340-1041 x211
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 2:38
Stephen, All,
I'm interested in helping (as much as I can) get P64-system (of which
Win64 is one such system) support into core OpenSSL. Can you give me
some pointers? I've made some progress with the old patch that IBM
provided a year or so ago (http://tinyurl.com/4b8dn), as I mentioned
in an
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the response.
Could you let me know why is this not supported?
This used to work before and since the API doens't
allow it it seems to be a valid use?
Thanks
Kapil
--- Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Mar 4 11:36:07 2005]:
Hi,
I am currently out of the office and will return on April 1st. If you have any
technical questions or problems, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED], or Ryan
Truong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Thanks, Edgar
__
OpenSSL Project
14 matches
Mail list logo