Re: [openssl.org #1089] test report for OpenBSD -current

Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > Thanks for the positive report! Apropos the 'test skipped' stuff, I'm > not sure why skipping tests on unbuilt algorithms is self-defeating. It didn't skip only the tests on unbuilt algorithms, it skipped *all* the tests. > Anyway, I'm resolving this ticket. >

Re: [openssl.org #1089] test report for OpenBSD -current

Richard Levitte via RT wrote: Thanks for the positive report! Apropos the 'test skipped' stuff, I'm not sure why skipping tests on unbuilt algorithms is self-defeating. It didn't skip only the tests on unbuilt algorithms, it skipped *all* the tests. Anyway, I'm resolving this ticket. [EMAIL

[ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.8 beta 4 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 4 OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS http://www.openssl.org/ OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The fourth beta is now released. The beta release is available for

Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: OpenSSL_0_9_8-stable: openssl/crypto/pqueue/ pq_compat....

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 06 Jun 2005 09:39:51 +1000 (EST), "Brian Havard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: brianh> There's a few other places where VMS is specifically tested for related to brianh> this that probably should also be changed. brianh> brianh> IE ./ssl/d1_pkt.c:139,1456,174

[openssl.org #1043] Updated 0.9.7g NetWare Patch for the Contribution page

Added the 0.9.7g diff. Thanks! Ticket resolved. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.

Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: OpenSSL_0_9_8-stable: openssl/crypto/pqueue/ pq_compat....

There's a few other places where VMS is specifically tested for related to this that probably should also be changed. IE ./ssl/d1_pkt.c:139,1456,1741 ./ssl/d1_pkt.c:135 ./crypto/pqueue/pqueue.c:202 Currently, without BN_LLONG defined, I get this: ./ssl/d1_pkt.c: In function `dtls1_record_r

[openssl.org #1074] rpmbuild -tb openssl-0.9.7g.tar.gz fails

[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed May 18 18:43:41 2005]: > When I attempt to build openssl-0.9.7g in with rpmbuild (i.e. rpmbuild > -tb openssl-0.9.7g.tar.gz ) the build always fails with the following > error. > > RPM build errors: > File not found: /var/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g-root/var/ssl/lib And it's

[openssl.org #1080] Test reports

Thanks for the test reports. Please do it again on beta 4 when it comes out (soon). Ticket resolved. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue May 31 13:49:18 2005]: > Report for Win32 tests: > <> > Report for Linux tests: > <> > > > > *

[openssl.org #1083] Compilation error in crypto/pqueue/pqueue.c on "hpux-parisc-cc shared"

beta 4 is out soon. Please try it and report back. I believe the BN_ULLONG issues with pqueue are properly dealt with. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue May 31 14:01:08 2005]: > cc: "pqueue.h", line 73: error 1000: Unexpected symbol: "BN_ULLONG". > cc: "pqueue.h", line 73: error 1573: Type of "priority

[openssl.org #1085] DJGPP patch for 0.9.8-beta3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue May 31 17:03:31 2005]: > There is one problem with beta-3 which also occurred in earler > versions, but which I had overlooked, since no errors were generated. > On DJGPP, install_docs stops after installing man1/CA.pl.1. No other > man pages were installed. The rest of th

[openssl.org #1086] openssl-0.9.8-beta3 on ULTRIX 4.5 (cc)

It looks to me like the sha512 problem has been solved by moving up the inclusion of opensslconf.h. I think I just solved the pq_compat.h problem by make the check for those environments that need to use BIGNUM a bit more generic. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue May 31 17:03:47 2005]: > Environment:

[openssl.org #1089] test report for OpenBSD -current

Thanks for the positive report! Apropos the 'test skipped' stuff, I'm not sure why skipping tests on unbuilt algorithms is self-defeating. Anyway, I'm resolving this ticket. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 1 10:10:50 2005]: > Hi, > > Here is a testlog for OpenBSD -current. We probably won't get

[openssl.org #1090] [BUG] Segfault in dgst signing with rsa private key

Did you check that you actually get the right library? Do it like this: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ldd ./apps/openssl If you don't get the library paths you expected, you need to use LD_PRELOAD. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 1 17:20:13 2005]: > Hello! > > I use 0.9.8-stable-SNAP-20050601 snapshot. Pr

[openssl.org #1091] openssl-0.9.8-beta3 on ULTRIX 4.5 (gcc)

Change applied and committed. Thanks. Ticket resolved. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 1 17:20:55 2005]: > Environment: openssl-0.9.8-beta3, ULTRIX 4.5, ultrix-gcc (gcc 2.95.3) > > On this platform, gcc 2.95.3 supports 64-bit integer. To enable SHA512 > (and avoid the "undefined BN_ULLONG" probl

[openssl.org #1094] openssl-0.9.8-beta3 doesn't build on Linux IA64

I think I resolved this. Configure erroneously refered to ia64.o instead of bn-ia64.o... Fix committed and will be part of beta4. Thanks for the notification. Ticket resolved. If there is still a problem with this, please generate a new bug report. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jun 3 12:58:08

[openssl.org #1095] IA64 Linux: Intel compiler name change

Hi! Patch applied and committed to the 0.9.8 and 0.9.9-dev branches. Thanks. Ticket resolved. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jun 3 12:58:18 2005]: > Reference: [openssl.org #516] > > A couple of years ago, I submitted a patch to the Configure > script to support the Intel compiler on Linux/IA64,

[openssl.org #1097] Bug Report

Hi, I just applied and committed the proposed change. Thanks! Ticket resolved. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Jun 4 19:24:48 2005]: > In function X509_cmp_time file X509_vfy.c > > Existing code for handling offset on validity time: > > if (*str == 'Z') > offset=0; > else

[openssl.org #1098] NetWare patch for 0.9.8-beta3

Thanks for the patch. I just applied and committed them. Ticket closed. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

[openssl.org #1099] Problem with keysize operations

Brad Hards wrote: > I'm trying to determine the length (in bits) for my DSA and DH keys. I'm > happily using RSA_size() for RSA keys, and I assumed that DSA_size and > DH_size would do equivalent operations (based on the man page for > BN_size_bits, which states 'If you want to know the "key s

Re: Prime checking fails for small primes

Hello! On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Marc wrote: When I discovered that, from openssl's point of view, 67, 51, 1009, ... where not primes, 51 is not prime. -- SY, Dmitry Belyavsky (ICQ UIN 6575) __ OpenSSL Project

Prime checking fails for small primes

Hi all, I was developping some program with openssl, and for debugging purposes I started working with small numbers (word-sized). When I discovered that, from openssl's point of view, 67, 51, 1009, ... where not primes, I was tempted to restart maths...until I found the "bug": in crypto/bn/b