RE: [openssl.org #1190] bug report

2005-11-01 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Sam, What happens when you put the directive no-asm for config? Ted >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of sharma via RT >Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:31 AM >Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org >Subject: RE: [openssl.org #1190] bug report > > >

Re: Problem using Broadcom uBSec engine in 0.9.8

2005-11-01 Thread Geoff Thorpe
Hi Martin, Comments inline. On October 28, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Del Vecchio wrote: > Yes, there are two different libubsec.so libraries: > > 1) The one built in OpenSSL with "./config shared"; this > is the stub library that contains "bind_engine", etc. > > 2) The one provided by the Br

Re: [PATCH] Support for Windows Mobile (on device Console)

2005-11-01 Thread Andy Polyakov
The approach I took with wcecompat and integration with OpenSSL was to make OpenSSL have as little special knowledge of CE as possible. And my suggestion is to identify unnecessary code in given context and instead of striving for patching holes, just eliminate the redundant code. E.g. [at lea

RE: [PATCH] Support for Windows Mobile (on device Console)

2005-11-01 Thread Steven Reddie
The approach I took with wcecompat and integration with OpenSSL was to make OpenSSL have as little special knowledge of CE as possible. This means that wcecompat emulates missing ANSI/Posix functionality so that OpenSSL simply continues to program to the standard interfaces. Wcecompat should be r

Re: [PATCH] Fix build for AmigaOS 4

2005-11-01 Thread Howard Chu
Johan Gill wrote: I'll change a few bits in this patch (make sure to open the console, not stdin) and make a small adjustment to make source changes count for m68k-amigaos as well (the clib I use is available for those OS versions too, it seems) so there's no rush. Is anyone still using m68k he

RE: [openssl.org #1190] bug report

2005-11-01 Thread sharma via RT
Hi The latest code crashes on Solaris Intel 5.8, this is the log output of compilation. making all in engines... gmake[4]: Entering directory `/home/srbpkg/srbpkg/ssl/32/openssl-0.9.8a/engines' gmake[4]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/home/srbpkg/srbpkg/ssl/32/openss

Re: [openssl.org #1222] Please introduce versioned symbols

2005-11-01 Thread Christoph Martin
Ted Mittelstaedt schrieb: >>From: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>openssl has evolved to a very important library in Linux distribution. A >>lot of cryptographic applications link to it including system libraries >>like pam modules and apache modules. Now it becomes more and more >>diffic

Re: [openssl.org #1233] Invalid makefile created on Win32 using mk1mf.pl

2005-11-01 Thread Steve Sonntag via RT
Your patch corrected the problem, thank you >>> On 01-Nov-05 at 2:29 am, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Nov 1 10:15:07 2005]: > The fix is: > > s/chop/chomp/ I don't agree, as chomp won't take away the ending space when the variable does get

Re: [openssl.org #1233] Invalid makefile created on Win32 using mk1mf.pl

2005-11-01 Thread Steve Sonntag
Your patch corrected the problem, thank you>>> On 01-Nov-05 at 2:29 am, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Nov  1 10:15:07 2005]:> The fix is:> > s/chop/chomp/I don't agree, as chomp won't take away the ending space when the variable does get a value. 

Re: [PATCH] Fix build for AmigaOS 4

2005-11-01 Thread Johan Gill
I'll change a few bits in this patch (make sure to open the console, not stdin) and make a small adjustment to make source changes count for m68k-amigaos as well (the clib I use is available for those OS versions too, it seems) so there's no rush. -- Johan Gill, [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: [openssl.org #1223] make test fails on some systems in 0.9.8a

2005-11-01 Thread Nils Larsch via RT
via RT wrote: ... > On a SuSE 9.0 machine, however, with gcc 3.3.1 and glibc 2.3.2 "make > test" deadlocks after: > > The following command should have some OK's and some failures > There are definitly a few expired certificates > ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ../apps/openssl verify -CApath ../certs ..

Re: PadLock engine SHA1 support

2005-11-01 Thread Andy Polyakov
Could be. But should it be run automatically during make? I guess no... No, but I'd like to *see* some test program and I'd like to hear explicit statement that the implementation passes this test. As you might recall we have tested AES by encypting with software and decrypting with engine and t

Re: [PATCH] Support for Windows Mobile (on device Console)

2005-11-01 Thread Andy Polyakov
[Code and binaries can be downloaded from http://www.it.uc3m.es/pervasive/wce_lite_compat/ ] This patch makes some fixes to the last OpenSSL official version 0.9.8a. First of all you have to realize that we're reluctant to accept functional patches to released code. Meaning that if you want t

[openssl.org #1223] make test fails on some systems in 0.9.8a

2005-11-01 Thread via RT
[guest - Wed Oct 19 12:58:28 2005]: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 19 11:47:39 2005]: > > > >>>On a SuSE 9.0 machine, however, with gcc 3.3.1 and glibc 2.3.2 "make > > >>>test" deadlocks after: > > >>> > > >>>The following command should have some OK's and some failures > > >>>There are definitly

Re: PadLock engine SHA1 support

2005-11-01 Thread Michal Ludvig
Andy Polyakov wrote: >> Could be. But should it be run automatically >> during make? I guess no... > > No, but I'd like to *see* some test program and I'd like to hear > explicit statement that the implementation passes this test. As you > might recall we have tested AES by encypting with softwar

Re: [openssl.org #1234] Failing to load zlib.so results in other errors later.

2005-11-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:18:42AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx via RT wrote: > > So this looks like an error that doesn't get cleared, and I have > to wonder who should clear it. I don't think COMP_zlib() should > return that it was actually succesful in opening the library, > so it should atleast return

[openssl.org #1233] Invalid makefile created on Win32 using mk1mf.pl

2005-11-01 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Nov 1 10:15:07 2005]: > The fix is: > > s/chop/chomp/ I don't agree, as chomp won't take away the ending space when the variable does get a value. Try the following patch for size and tell me how that worked for you: cvs diff: Diffing util Index: util/mk1mf.pl =

[openssl.org #1234] Failing to load zlib.so results in other errors later.

2005-11-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx via RT
Hi, Since the upgrade from 0.9.7g to 0.9.8a on Debian, we're getting alot of bug reports about applictions that give an error that they can't load zlib.so. When calling SSL_library_init(), it will try to load zlib.so, which doesn't have to exist. It should try to open zlib.so.1 instead because

[openssl.org #1233] Invalid makefile created on Win32 using mk1mf.pl

2005-11-01 Thread Steve Sonntag via RT
mk1mf.mk created an nt_dbg.mak with invalid syntax. A makefile fragment looked something like: - T_OBJ=$(OBJ_D)\md2test.obj ... E_OBJ SSLOBJ=$(OBJ_D)\s2_meth.obj ... - The equals was missing on E_OBJ. I traced the problem to subroutine "do_defs" in mk1mf.pl. The pertinent code is: