On 17/07/06, Kyle Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, when you're passing a pointer to a function as a parameter
to another function for callbacks and such.
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/funcparams.html
There's an example for qsort in there, but there's a problem: it loses
On 17/07/06, Kyle Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/funcparams.html
There's an example for qsort in there, but there's a problem: it loses
information between the XML and the output. Specifically, what's
printed is:
void qsort( dataptr,
On 7/17/06, Dave Pawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/07/06, Kyle Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, when you're passing a pointer to a function as a parameter
to another function for callbacks and such.
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/funcparams.html
There's an example for
I would much prefer ANSI notation than KR notation -- among other
things, all the other manpages use it, and KR was seriously
underspecified.
That said, though, it looks fairly good as it is now.
[...more after quote...]
On 7/18/06, Dave Pawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just ran that
On 18/07/06, Kyle Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said, I'd prefer ANSI notation, but as long as the parameters are
fully specified in the documentation I'll deal. :)
Input
article
section
titleFuncparams test/title
funcsynopsis
funcprototype
funcdefvoid
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:26:29PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
OK. I suggest I prepare a patch that will not change them (they will
be IPv4-only), will mark them with #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_DEPRECATED, and
will not add them to the .pod. Sounds reasonable?
Yes.
How about
I'm taking a look at it. Don't worry about RT stripping the
attachment, that's just for outgoing email. The patch is in the
database, and I just downloaded it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jul 18 13:33:56 2006]:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:26:29PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS
Whacker wrote:
Well, the first news report is out stating that the FIPS 140-2 validation
of the OpenSSL FIPS object module has been revoked:
http://www.gcn.com/online/vol1_no1/41371-1.html.
We don't know the full story behind this yet, and perhaps never will. As
John Weathersby noted in the article, This is
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:09:27 -0500 (CDT), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
marquess John and I are already being asked what happens next. At
marquess this point we don't know, but we haven't necessarily given
marquess up. As we learn more I'll pass on our findings here.
http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/funcsynopsis.html
Norm thinks he's fixed it.
I can't argue.
Do you guys agree with him,
see the KR vs Ansi examples?
regards DaveP
(See the support you get with docbook :-)
Only parameterization is to use KR or ANSI format (do you understand
the
Steve Marquess wrote:
Well, the first news report is out stating that the FIPS 140-2 validation
of the OpenSSL FIPS object module has been revoked:
http://www.gcn.com/online/vol1_no1/41371-1.html.
...
John and I are already being asked what happens next. At this point we
don't know, but
Looks good to me. Shall we? :)
-Kyle H
On 7/18/06, Dave Pawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/funcsynopsis.html
Norm thinks he's fixed it.
I can't argue.
Do you guys agree with him,
see the KR vs Ansi examples?
regards DaveP
(See the support you get with docbook
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bo Xie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jul 19, 2006 7:46 AM
Subject: Can we tailor openSSL?
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Does openSSL licence permit to tailor openSSL? e.g., we only need the
SHA-512 algorithm, so we want to tailor openSSL to only include
I wish to make it very clear that in this message I am speaking solely as
an individual, and do not represent my employer or its views in any way at
all.
We don't know the full story behind this yet, and perhaps never will. As
John Weathersby noted in the article, This is not about
14 matches
Mail list logo
