Hi Harald and Geoff,
Harald Welte wrote:
I searched the list archives but couldn't find anything apart from that single
message by Michal to the list. He is talking about someobody having asked him
to add testsuite support, but he didn't exactly know what he needs to add.
I could not find any
nicolas sitbon wrote:
Hi, I'm currently developping an application using libcrypto, I find
some memory leak with valgrind (please don't say me to compile with
-DPURIFY, I know that and in fact, my problem is not uninitialized data,
but rather memory leak) :
==26823== 1,552 (168 direct, 1,384
Sorry but Tim Hudson said me the answer previously, so now I know what's
the problem.
Thanks.
2008/9/11 Darryl Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nicolas sitbon wrote:
Hi, I'm currently developping an application using libcrypto, I find some
memory leak with valgrind (please don't say me to compile
Michal,
thanks so much for your detailed feedback. It is much appreciated.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:22:38PM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
And finally the one you already knew about. That's the final works for
me version ready to be committed to openssl tree current at that time
(may not
On Thursday 11 September 2008 09:06:39 Harald Welte wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:22:38PM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
And finally the one you already knew about. That's the final works for
me version ready to be committed to openssl tree current at that time
(may not apply smoothly
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:06:39PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
Yes, after reviewing the discussion and documentation I tend to agree. So the
best option really is to make OpenSSL use the userspace interface for the
kernel random number generator, and feed that kernel RNG's entropy pool from
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am having problem to pass test, BN_sqr in AIX 5.2 for version
openssl-0.9.7g.
Message:
test BN_sqr
Square test failed!
It is compiled with 64 mode in AIX 5.2. Here is the configuration:
CONFIGURE_ARGS=aix-gcc -maix64 --prefix=/usr/local/ssl64
Hi,
There is a memory leak - SSL_free() does not free memory allocated for
tlsext_hostname.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Nowak (aka drNo)
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Sander Temme via RT wrote:
2) Have the engine provide its own callbacks that get set in case the
application does not provide (presumably more suitable) alternatives:
I think it would be entirely sensible for OpenSSL to offer a build-time
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Sander Temme via RT wrote:
2) Have the engine provide its own callbacks that get set in case the
application does not provide (presumably more suitable) alternatives:
I think it would be entirely sensible for OpenSSL to offer a build-time
On Sep 11, 2008, at 7:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Sander Temme via RT wrote:
2) Have the engine provide its own callbacks that get set in case the
application does not provide (presumably more suitable) alternatives:
I think it would be
On Sep 11, 2008, at 7:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Sander Temme via RT wrote:
2) Have the engine provide its own callbacks that get set in case the
application does not provide (presumably more suitable) alternatives:
I think it would be
I don't think there's any taboo or a strong opposition against the
patch. It's just that Andy hasn't followed up, I sort of given up and
moved to other projects and the whole thing has gone forgotten.
Ok. I hope after my re-merge and testing we can get it integrated this
time.
BTW, my
On Thursday 11 September 2008 15:16:48 Andy Polyakov wrote:
BTW, my memory is vague here, is this Padlock block only able to do
one-shot hashing?
Yes, but a technique bypassing this limitation was proposed and proven
to work (as per end of SHA1 thread mentioned earlier). Technique
involved
You need to be really careful here. Simply being dependent on pthreads and
linking to non-threaded code is pure poison on some OS's. (HP/UX variants
come to mind).
If you do decide to add a default set of thread callbacks, you'll at least
need a build configuration to disable it - I'm only
Hi Peter,
On Sep 11, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Peter Waltenberg wrote:
You need to be really careful here. Simply being dependent on
pthreads and
linking to non-threaded code is pure poison on some OS's. (HP/UX
variants
come to mind).
I agree. These are systems I personally have no exposure
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:32:14AM -0400, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
I don't think there's any taboo or a strong opposition against the
patch. It's just that Andy hasn't followed up, I sort of given up and
moved to other projects and the whole thing has gone forgotten.
Ok. I hope after my
BTW, my memory is vague here, is this Padlock block only able to do one-shot
hashing?
Yes, but a technique bypassing this limitation was proposed and proven
to work (as per end of SHA1 thread mentioned earlier).
Proof of concept is here: http://logix.cz/michal/devel/padlock/phe_sum.xp
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Harald Welte wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:32:14AM -0400, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
I don't think there's any taboo or a strong opposition against
the patch. It's just that Andy hasn't followed up, I sort of
given up and moved to other projects and the whole thing
19 matches
Mail list logo
