Updated version for compatibility with 1.0.0beta1:
--- ssl/ssl.h 2008-12-27 03:09:23.0 +0100
+++ ssl/ssl.h 2009-04-16 10:14:12.0 +0200
@@ -1770,6 +1770,10 @@
/* Pre-shared secret session resumption functions */
int SSL_set_session_secret_cb(SSL *s, tls_session_secret_cb_f
Updated version for compatibility with 1.0.0beta1:
--- ssl/d1_clnt.c 2008-06-02 00:33:24.0 +0200
+++ ssl/d1_clnt.c 2009-04-16 09:41:59.0 +0200
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
switch(s->state)
{
case SSL_ST_RENEGOTIATE:
-
Hello,
Mazal-tov for getting Beta out. I am interested in the implementation of the
null-ciphers (when the encryption is mandatory, and clear-text used). This is
part of RFC 4785, which I didn't see in the log changes of openssl 1.0 beta.
Any plans for 1.0? If you have any information on this, I
In ssl/kssl.c the constant _XOPEN_SOURCE is defined which results in
using an old POSIX version and compilation problems on recent FreeBSD
systems when adding SCTP support (necessary for SCTP-aware DTLS).
With _XOPEN_SOURCE defined to 500, in sys/cdefs.h the constant
_POSIX_C_SOURCE will get
The corresponding patch for 0.9.8 and 1.0.0:
--- ssl/kssl.c 2009-02-14 22:49:38.0 +0100
+++ ssl/kssl.c 2009-04-16 13:30:18.0 +0200
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
#include
-#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 500 /* glibc2 needs this to declare strptime() */
+#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 600 /* glibc2 needs
Hello,
the c_rehash script produced from openssl/tools/c_rehash.in rev. 1.11
fails to execute the openssl binary if the environment variable OPENSSL
does not contain the absolute pathname to the binary and the current
working directory does not contain it as well.
I guess this is just a small typ
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009, Ouaknine, Keren wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Mazal-tov for getting Beta out. I am interested in the implementation of the
> null-ciphers (when the encryption is mandatory, and clear-text used). This is
> part of RFC 4785, which I didn't see in the log changes of openssl 1.0 beta.
>
> I guess this is just a small typo because a search for the binary is
> done (lines 29--41) but the result is not used. The attached patch
> fixes the problem.
...and here's the patch I forgot to attach...
--
This email fills a much-needed gap in the archives.
--- tools/c_rehash.in.orig
I just had another look at the code in ssl/kssl.c and didn't find any
use of strptime(). The header file time.h doesn't need to be included
at all, because there is nothing (left) requiring it. So the code
should be removed.
--- ssl/kssl.c 2009-02-14 22:49:38.0 +0100
+++ ssl/kssl.c
I'm not sure about this. Surely if the openssl utility is found on the
PATH it should be able to execute it without having to include its
absolute pathname?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> I'm not sure about this. Surely if the openssl utility is found on the
> PATH it should be able to execute it without having to include its
> absolute pathname?
Sure, but the problem is the way c_rehash checks whether $openssl is
executable or not in the `if (-d $dir
11 matches
Mail list logo