Hi,
In the past, when new releases have been announced,
and particularly those related to a Security Advisory, there
have been diffs of the modules that changed. These were very
helpful in patching older versions of openssl in situations
where an immediate upgrade was not possible. Would
Hi Richard,
Is that a generic Itanium routine or
is that specifically for 32-bit? The only
reason I ask is that we compile for both
32 and 64-bit address pointers when putting
together our VMS kit.
Thanks,
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Retry since it looks like the first one
did not get there.
-Original Message-
From: Greaney, Kevin
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004
8:22 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: Greaney, Kevin; Mosteika, Paul
Edward (OpenVMS Engineering)
Subject: Config file questions
Hi,
While we were
porting to 0.9.7D to our latest VMS product,
we ran into some
issues with [.APPS]OPENSSL-VMS.CNF.
The bulleted list
of items highlights each area of concern.
Missing field names in OPENSSL-VMS.CNF
In
comparing OPENSSL-VMS.CNF with OPENSSL.CNF,
it
appears
Hi,
I
have been having some problems with the startdate
and dnddate in my certificates being skewed since I upgraded
from 0.9.6G to 0.9.7D. I have traced it down to OPENSSL_gmtime,
which is located in O_TIME.C. My question is should OPENSSL_gmtime
be returning a time in the local
Hi,
Yes, there is a version of SSL that has
been ported to OpenVMS for the Itanium platform.
The current version is based on 0.9.6G plus the
security patches. We are currently working on
0.9.7D, and it will ship this summer with the
next version of OpenVMS operating system.
Hi,
I found the following text at http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/ca.html# :
unique_subject
if the value yes is given, the valid certificate entries in the database must
have unique subjects. if the value no is given, several valid certificate entries may
have the exact same
Title: RSA Blinding patch and a recent snapshot.
Hi,
I downloaded a snapshot recently, openssl-e-0.9.6-stable-SNAP-20030327.tar.gz,
and was comparing the files [.crypto.rsa]rsa_eay.c AND [.crypto.rsa]rsa_lib.c. I noticed
that in rsa_eay.c that the patch used the positive when comparing,
Hi,
Building Beta6 on OpenVMS V7.2-1, with TCP/IP Services V5.0A
and Compaq C V6.2-008. I have included the output from the MAKEVMS.COM
as well as the error log. I have not had a chance to dig into any of
these yet.
If you need anything further, please don't hesitate to ask.
Hi,
I ran across a difference between SSL.H and SYMHACKS.H:
In SSL.H, there is:
#define SSL_get_ex_data_X509_STORE_CTX_idx
SSL_get_ex_data_X509_STORE_CTX_i
This is embedded in about ten lines surrounded by an #ifdef VMS. SSL.H
also does not include
SYMHACKS.H, which I
Title: DES_CBC_CKSUM in SSL and Kerberos.
Hi,
I have a customer with a Kerberos V4 application who is trying to decide if they can substitute their existing Kerberos V4 DES encryption capability with SSL's DES encryption support. When calling DES_CBC_CKSUM() from the Kerberos library, the
Hi,
I noticed that between 0.9.6A and 0.9.6B, the file RAND_VMS.C
was dropped. I also noticed that is was missing from CRYPTO-LIB.COM.
When I checked the CVS system to see when it was removed (and maybe
where it ended up), I noticed that CRYPTO-LIB.COM still has the reference
to
Hi Richard,
OpenSSL 0.9.6A Beta 2 [Engine] Built cleanly and passed all tests.
OpenVMS V7.1-2 DEC C V6.0-001
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Hi Richard,
Just to let you know, the
openssl-engine-0.9.6-stable-SNAP-20010314.tar.gz can not be
built on a VMS system with ODS-2 File System. The file name is too long.
It exceeds the
39 character filename limit. I am building
openssl-0.9.6-stable-SNAP-20010314.tar.gz now
and
14 matches
Mail list logo
