I (or VIA) do anything to help this along?
Thanks in advance,
--
- Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applica
case, I am here, I have time, and I will do whatever it takes to the
code to make you guys happy with it for integration. So please talk to me ;)
Thanks again.
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:51:30PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> Hi OpenSSL developers,
>
> as part of my work f
nSSL mainline disabled it.
I searched the list archives and RT before, but didn't find anything on either
the RNG or the SHA issue.
Cheers,
--
- Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
agree. So the
best option really is to make OpenSSL use the userspace interface for the
kernel random number generator, and feed that kernel RNG's entropy pool from
the hardware RNG.
I'll submit a patch to OpenSSL which gives a more detailed description in the
comment since I t
> I'll submit a patch to OpenSSL which gives a more detailed description in
> > the comment since I think it is sort of like a FAQ for those people who
> > actually discover the padlocn no-RNG flag :)
>
>
e software
implementation as opposed to any hardware-accelerated engine? Just not use the
'-engine' statement? But I guess in this case the default depends on the
openssl configuration file, doesn't it?
Thanks in advance,
--
- Harald Welte <[E
just implementation...
>
> Thoughts?
Sounds completely fine with me. I'll do some experimentation after I'm
finished with the PadLock PHE (hashing) stuff and cook up a patch. Since
I'm currently quite busy it will probably take some time.
--
- Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTE
