Re: Is the openssl.org site down?

2002-09-05 Thread Paul L. Allen
age is low priority. :-) Paul Allen -- Boeing Phantom Works \ Paul L. Allen, (425) 865-3297 Math & Computing Technology \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] POB 3707 M/S 7L-40, Seattle, WA 98124-2207 \ Prototype Systems Group _

Re: 64 bit support

2002-04-24 Thread Paul L. Allen
a year. I found and submitted one bug related to sizeof(int) not being 4, but that was a long time ago. Paul Allen -- Boeing Phantom Works \ Paul L. Allen, (425) 865-3297 Math & Computing Technology \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] POB 3707 M/S 7L-40, Seattle, WA 98124-2207 \

Re: 64 bit support

2002-04-25 Thread Paul L. Allen
ossibly 2.95.3? Have you reported the failures? Back when I actually had an Alpha, I had "make test" running cleanly all the way through. It would be a shame if another bug crept back in and stayed because nobody reported it. Paul Allen -- Boeing Phantom Works \ Paul L. A

Re: 64 bit support

2002-04-25 Thread Paul L. Allen
"Paul L. Allen" wrote: > Just a data point: I just grabbed a copy of openssl-0.9.6d-beta1 and did the following on an Alpha running RedHat 6.2 with gcc=egcs-2.91.66: ./config make make test All of the tests succeeded. Are there bugs in the bignum code that don't get caught

Re:

2002-05-13 Thread Paul L. Allen
re any insight into this. > > Jeffery M. Yarbrough > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated