Hello Noel,
You may as well try to find a way to workaround this problem for your
platform, instead of just removing the offending code (which may break
other things) ...
This is taken from the MSDN library description of
CreateToolhelp32Snapshot():
Windows NT/2000/XP: Included in Windows
Hello Axel,
Saturday, May 04, 2002, 12:37:33 AM, you wrote:
AHS Hi Lutz!
AHS On Fri, 03 May 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:01:52PM +0200, Axel H. Siebenwirth wrote:
unfortunately openssl-0.9.6d-beta1 won?t compile on my system. I have this
strange feeling that it?s
Is there any chance that somone will comment on this topic anytime
soon ?
PT Does the attached oneliner make sense ? IMO it doesnt break anything,
PT but allows reusing the EVP_CIPHER_CTX in calls to EVP_EncryptUpdate,
PT after EVP_EncryptFinal is called.
PT Any comments greatly appreciated :)
this could have ever worked.
DL -lee
DL -Original Message-
DL From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
DL Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:27 AM
DL To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DL Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Question on EVP encryption/decryption routines
DL Is there any chance that somone will comment
DL I'm not on the dev team or anything, but I don't understand how you could have
*ever* successfully encrypted multiple streams with the same EVP context??? Just the
IV's alone would have been
DL screwed up for CBC ciphers and stream ciphers like RC4 would completely break.
PT ECB won't - IV
Does the attached oneliner make sense ? IMO it doesnt break anything,
but allows reusing the EVP_CIPHER_CTX in calls to EVP_EncryptUpdate,
after EVP_EncryptFinal is called.
Any comments greatly appreciated :)
The diff is against the released 0.9.6c version of the OpenSSL
library.
PT Currently
Sorry for the double post - it seems like the ml software sets the
reply to addres to the ml address and I've pressed 'Reply All'. I'll
be more carefull in the feature :)
__
OpenSSL Project
Hello,
I have a simple question:
Currently EVP_Encrypt* interface doesnt support
encryption of multiple data streams with a single
symmetric key. Is there any chance patches to
allow this to be accepted in the official OpenSSL
codebase ? Currently I'm thinking to modify EVP_EncryptFinal
so it
Hello Arturo,
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 11:26:56 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
AMG /usr/ucb/cc: language optional software package not installed
AMG *** Error code 1
Since you don't provide any detail about the build system I have to
guess. My first guess is that you're trying to compile on some
This is a forwarded message
From: Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, April 11, 2002, 12:39:59 PM
Subject: [BUG suggested PATCH] EVP_DecodeUpdate 0.9.6b 0.9.6c
Any comments on this ? I posted on openssl-users but got no response
at all - either confirming
Hello Lutz,
Friday, April 12, 2002, 10:12:04 AM, you wrote:
Any comments on this ? I posted on openssl-users but got no response
at all - either confirming on denying...
LJ Your posting is still in my incoming queue.
LJ Obviously my team mates normally dealing with EVP issues are currently
11 matches
Mail list logo
