Re: Patch for OS/X 10.1 (tested w/ 10.1.2)

2002-01-07 Thread Steve Quirk
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > My hint - or solution :( is to remove the /usr/lib/libcrypto.* and > /usr/lib/libssl.* _BEFORE_ compiling OpenSSL Removing libssl.* and libcrypt.* is a BAD idea - you'll break some important stuff that's linked against them. E.g. Mail's Message

Re: Help with openssl-0.9.6c for Mac OS X

2002-01-07 Thread Steve Quirk
Probably because you're not using an ebcdic computer and ebcdic.o has no symbols. You might be comforted by the line that precedes it: "You may get an error following this line. Please ignore." - sq On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Jay States wrote: > why does /usr/bin/ranlib: file: ../../libcrypto.a(

Re: Help with openssl-0.9.6c for Mac OS X

2002-01-07 Thread Steve Quirk
thing? IIRC, you have to do some funky make invocations to get this (SHLIB_EXT=.dyld &etc). I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "partial configure", though. Steve ------ Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:20:07 -0500 (EST) From: Steve Quirk <[EMAIL PR

Re: Help with openssl-0.9.6c for Mac OS X

2002-01-07 Thread Steve Quirk
ld is trying to link against the lib that Apple ships. Before building openssl (which will replace Apple's libs), you need to move/rename/unlink /usr/lib/libcrypto.dylib and /usr/lib/libssl.dylib. Then you *might* be able to build them. Now, there's another issue from another email on the list

openssl asm for ppc?

2001-04-27 Thread Steve Quirk
Has anyone done any work on the asm for the PPC platform? I'm using 0.9.6a on Mac OSX. gprof shows that most of my time is spent in the bn routines that are normally asm (on other platforms): % cumulative self self total time seconds secondscalls ms/call ms/call

Re: Openssl and Darwin

2001-04-12 Thread Steve Quirk
You're inadvertantly linking against the openssl 0.9.5 libraries that Apple ships. Before typing 'make', remove the libraries /usr/lib/libcrypto.dylib and /usr/lib/libssl.dylib and you should be on the the next problem. Steve You need to remove the librari On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ian Bishop wrot

Re: OS X

2000-10-21 Thread Steve Quirk
The currently shipping OS X (public beta) comes with 0.9.5a installed. One can make the assumption that Apple plans on taking care of compatibility/support going forward. I haven't tried it, but installing 0.9.6 should be straightforward. ('configure && make') Steve On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Richa