I built and tested openssl-0.9.6a-beta1 on Cygwin. It needs the DOS
patch that I previously submitted, and running the djcopy.sh script
that is generated, in order to build cleanly because of problems with
symbolic links. Otherwise there are a number of 0 byte files, rather
than symbolic links
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Richard Levitte wrote:
The release of the second beta of OpenSSL 0.9.6a is scheduled for
Monday 2001-03-19. To make sure that it will work correctly, please
test this version (especially on less common platforms), and report
any problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Here is
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Richard Levitte wrote:
The release of the second beta of OpenSSL 0.9.6a is scheduled for
Monday 2001-03-19. To make sure that it will work correctly, please
test this version (especially on less common platforms), and report
any problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Here is
From: lgazis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lgazis OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta 1 test on AIX 4.3, using engine version:
lgazis
lgazis This requires two modifications to make it work: -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
Doesn't that also require linking with -ldl?
Also, is dl*() implemented on older AIX versions?
--
Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta 1 released
From: lgazis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lgazis OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta 1 test on AIX 4.3, using engine version:
lgazis
From: lgazis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lgazis I'm not sure about dl*() and older AIX versions.
One way might be to assume that AIX 4 has dl*(), and have separate
configurations for AIX 3. Then it's up to config to find out what
version we're dealing with.
I assume that "uname -v" gives "4" and "uname
From: lgazis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lgazis Yes, "uname -v" gives "4" and "uname -r" gives "3" on an AIX 4.3 box.
lgazis
lgazis Here's what I turned up on dlopen(), dlclose(), and dlsym() on AIX:
lgazis http://www.unixguide.net/ibm/faq/faq2.26.shtml.
Perfect. So starting with 4.2, basically...
--
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta 1 released
The first beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.6a is now available from the
OpenSSL FTP site URL: ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/.
OpenSSL 0.9.6a is a bug-fix release of version
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 01:20:28PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
From: lgazis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lgazis OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta 1 test on AIX 4.3, using engine version:
lgazis
lgazis This requires two modifications to make it work: -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
Doesn't that also
Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta 1 released
From: lgazis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lgazis OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta 1 test on AIX 4.3, using
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Hmm. The DSO code was considerably changed for the 0.9.7 version and
changes
are not completed yet (additional security aspects must be considered with
respect to the search path).
The 0.9.6a is only intended to fix bugs and especially should not break
existing
It seems like a line is missing in 'ms\32all.bat':
set OPTS=no-asm
perl Configure VC-WIN32
perl util\mkfiles.pl MINFO NEW
perl util\mk1mf.pl %OPTS% debug VC-WIN32 d32.mak
perl util\mk1mf.pl %OPTS% VC-WIN32 32.mak
perl util\mk1mf.pl %OPTS% debug dll VC-WIN32
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:15:24PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
From: Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lutz.Jaenicke Hmm. The DSO code was considerably changed for the
Lutz.Jaenicke 0.9.7 version and changes are not completed yet
Lutz.Jaenicke (additional security aspects must
From: Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lutz.Jaenicke 1.10 breaks existing functionality, since once ".sl" is
Lutz.Jaenicke used, ".so" crypto engines will not be loaded any
Lutz.Jaenicke longer (and they were loaded with 0.9.6 as ".so").
But since shared libraries on HP-UX are normally named
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:56:44PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
From: Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lutz.Jaenicke 1.10 breaks existing functionality, since once ".sl" is
Lutz.Jaenicke used, ".so" crypto engines will not be loaded any
Lutz.Jaenicke longer (and they were
Compaq C V6.2-008 on OpenVMS Alpha V7.2-1
DIGITAL TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.0A
on a AlphaServer 1200 5/533 4MB running OpenVMS V7.2-1
$ @makevms /out=openssl096ab1.log all norsaref nodebug decc
---
8 snip 8
16 matches
Mail list logo
