Kyle Hamilton wrote:
I'd like to see a generic callback mechanism in that I want to be able
to write my own dispatcher for TLS extensions.
You already have this, you can intercept all messages.
--
To verify the signature, see http://edelpki.edelweb.fr/
Cela vous permet de charger le certific
I'd like to see a generic callback mechanism in that I want to be able
to write my own dispatcher for TLS extensions. I also want to be able
to call something to put my own extension data in place per-SSL_CTX.
(I want to be able to violate the TLS extension specification, if only
to verify that m
Hello,
Since I was pretty active in providing the current code, here are some
of our thoughts which may or may not be compatible with the core team.
In 2004, we had developped some extensions for the 0.9.7d version concerning
servername and srp. We initially also had the idea and a logic where o
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:00:04PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> As has happened previously the functionality in the HEAD is not set in stone
> and may be subject to change.
>
> I'm aware of the 0.9.9 TLS extension efforts but I'm not currently actively
> involved with them. I have a shed lo
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Long
>Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:58 AM
>To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
>Subject: Re: [openssl.org #1276] [PATCH] TLS Extensions - RFC 3546 (Try
>2)
>
>
>On Fri, 2006
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
> Brian Long wrote:
> >On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 15:23 +0100, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> >
> >>Note that some TLS extension code has recently been committed to the
> >>HEAD (0.9.9-dev). So if this is to be included into OpenSSL it would
> >>have
Brian Long wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 15:23 +0100, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
Note that some TLS extension code has recently been committed to the
HEAD (0.9.9-dev). So if this is to be included into OpenSSL it would
have to work with that.
Is it true that openssl-0.9.7 and 0.9.8 are
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 15:23 +0100, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 27 15:01:56 2006]:
>
> >
> > This patch is adding support for TLS hello extensions and externally
> > generated pre-shared key material to OpenSSL 0.9.8. This is
> > based on the patch from Alexey Koboze
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:23:32PM +0100, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> > This patch is adding support for TLS hello extensions and externally
> > generated pre-shared key material to OpenSSL 0.9.8.
> Note that some TLS extension code has recently been committed to the
> HEAD (0.9.9-dev). So if
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 15:23 +0100, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 27 15:01:56 2006]:
>
> >
> > This patch is adding support for TLS hello extensions and externally
> > generated pre-shared key material to OpenSSL 0.9.8. This is
> > based on the patch from Alexey Koboze
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 27 15:01:56 2006]:
>
> This patch is adding support for TLS hello extensions and externally
> generated pre-shared key material to OpenSSL 0.9.8. This is
> based on the patch from Alexey Kobozev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (sent to openssl-dev mailing list on Tue, 07 Jun 20
Please excuse the previous HTML email. The following is the patch
included in wpa_supplicant.
---
This patch is adding support for TLS hello extensions and externally
generated pre-shared key material to OpenSSL 0.9.8. This is
based on the patch from
Please excuse the previous HTML email. The following is the patch
included in wpa_supplicant.
---
This patch is adding support for TLS hello extensions and externally
generated pre-shared key material to OpenSSL 0.9.8. This is
based on the patch from A
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd";>
CVS log for hostap/wpa_supplicant/openssl-tls-extensions.patch
CVS log for
hostap/wpa_supplicant/openssl-tls-extensions.patch
Help
Up to [HostAP] / hostap / wpa_supplicant
Request diff between arbitrary revisions
Default branch: MAIN
Boo
14 matches
Mail list logo
