In message on Fri, 15 Jan 2016 18:38:32 +,
"Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" said:
uri> On 1/15/16, 13:34 , "openssl-dev on behalf of Richard Levitte"
uri> wrote:
uri>
uri> >In message <569937f1.6000...@kippdata.de> on Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:18:25
uri> >+0100, Rainer Jung said:
uri> >
uri> >
On 1/15/16, 13:34 , "openssl-dev on behalf of Richard Levitte"
wrote:
>In message <569937f1.6000...@kippdata.de> on Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:18:25
>+0100, Rainer Jung said:
>
>rainer.jung> In addition one could wish to put the preferred major
>version (1.0.2?)
>rainer.jung> first in the list. Despite
In message <569937f1.6000...@kippdata.de> on Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:18:25 +0100,
Rainer Jung said:
rainer.jung> Hi,
rainer.jung>
rainer.jung> the list of downloadable files on http://openssl.org/source/
contains
rainer.jung> pre1 *and* pre2 files for 1.1. Furthermore pre1 is listed above
rainer.j
Hi,
the list of downloadable files on http://openssl.org/source/ contains
pre1 *and* pre2 files for 1.1. Furthermore pre1 is listed above pre2.
IMHO pre2 is what people should test and pre1 is no longer entitled to
be listed on that page. So I suggest to remove pre1 from the list.
I don't kn