[openssl.org #1104] [Bug Reoprt] -days parameter overflow

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
On Thu Sep 04 23:19:14 2014, rsalz wrote: > openssl uses time_t for its internal time value. > On a platform where time_t is 32 bits, the maximum time value is sometime in > the year 2038 Actually this is no longer the case. There was a time_t depencency in OpenSSL 0.9.8 and earlier which caused o

[openssl.org #1104] [Bug Reoprt] -days parameter overflow

2014-09-04 Thread Rich Salz via RT
openssl uses time_t for its internal time value. On a platform where time_t is 32 bits, the maximum time value is sometime in the year 2038 -- Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #1104] [Bug Reoprt] -days parameter overflow

2005-06-08 Thread Jack Lloyd
11913 days ~= 32.6 years; time_t overflow? On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:17:42PM +0200, Markus Stier via RT wrote: > > Hi! > > I wanted to crete a self signed certificate with a long lifetime. > Problem: the "-days" parameter does not accept appropriate values. There is > an > overflow at 11913

[openssl.org #1104] [Bug Reoprt] -days parameter overflow

2005-06-08 Thread Markus Stier via RT
Hi! I wanted to crete a self signed certificate with a long lifetime. Problem: the "-days" parameter does not accept appropriate values. There is an overflow at 11913 days, 11912 days are ok. example: openssl req -new -x509 -key mykey.pem -out mycert.cer -sha1 -days 11913 Version: 0.9.7g 11.4.