[openssl.org #1413] v0.9.7l: some comments

2014-06-30 Thread Rich Salz via RT
I believe all of these things already exist in the current source. If not, please file a new ticket. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-

Re: [openssl.org #1413] v0.9.7l: some comments

2006-10-20 Thread Andy Polyakov
In Debian on Linux / i386, we actually build the shared library 4 times with different optimizations. Once for i386, once for i486, 586, 686/cmov. Does it really help? I can understand i386 for broadest binary compatibility, but the rest can as well be code generated for i486 but optimized fo

Re: [openssl.org #1413] v0.9.7l: some comments

2006-10-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:47:48AM +0200, ThMO via RT wrote: > > What I would like to see is a single Makefile doing both in one go, which > simplies things a lot, e.g. considering the openssl binary, the following > procedure is needed: > · make -f Makefile.shared > · installing the stuff > · mak

Re: [openssl.org #1413] v0.9.7l: some comments

2006-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, > What I would like to see is a single Makefile doing both in one go, > which simplies things a lot, e.g. considering the openssl binary, the > following procedure is needed: As long as that does not disable the ability to build static libs _with_ -fPIC flag (there are peo

Re: [openssl.org #1413] v0.9.7l: some comments

2006-10-16 Thread ThMO via RT
Hello Kurt, > [...] > > I've enclosed it inside an #ifdef checking for the symbol HAVE_POLL_H, > > which `./Configure' should check for and using select() instead. > > I thought poll() just used select() internaly in those version of the > kernel? oops, I've had a look inside the kernel and

Re: [openssl.org #1413] v0.9.7l: some comments

2006-10-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx via RT
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 08:18:59PM +0200, ThMO via RT wrote: > > Hello, > > I've attached a small unified diff, fixing a problem: > > · crypto/rand/rand_unix.c: > linux kernel v2.0.35 doesn't support the `poll' system call, so this > file will only compile with the patch applied. > I've e

Re: [openssl.org #1413] v0.9.7l: some comments

2006-10-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 08:18:59PM +0200, ThMO via RT wrote: > > Hello, > > I've attached a small unified diff, fixing a problem: > > · crypto/rand/rand_unix.c: > linux kernel v2.0.35 doesn't support the `poll' system call, so this > file will only compile with the patch applied. > I've en

[openssl.org #1413] v0.9.7l: some comments

2006-10-15 Thread ThMO via RT
Hello, I've attached a small unified diff, fixing a problem: · crypto/rand/rand_unix.c: linux kernel v2.0.35 doesn't support the `poll' system call, so this file will only compile with the patch applied. I've enclosed it inside an #ifdef checking for the symbol HAVE_POLL_H, which `./Conf