Looks like the last suggested patch against this ticket was applied. No further
activity since 2008, so assuming this is resolved. Closing.
Matt
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1736
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Sander Temme via RT wrote:
2) Have the engine provide its own callbacks that get set in case the
application does not provide (presumably more suitable) alternatives:
I think it would be entirely sensible for OpenSSL to offer a build-time
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Sander Temme via RT wrote:
2) Have the engine provide its own callbacks that get set in case the
application does not provide (presumably more suitable) alternatives:
I think it would be entirely sensible for OpenSSL to offer a build-time
On Sep 11, 2008, at 7:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Sander Temme via RT wrote:
2) Have the engine provide its own callbacks that get set in case the
application does not provide (presumably more suitable) alternatives:
I think it would be
On Sep 11, 2008, at 7:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Sander Temme via RT wrote:
2) Have the engine provide its own callbacks that get set in case the
application does not provide (presumably more suitable) alternatives:
I think it would be
You need to be really careful here. Simply being dependent on pthreads and
linking to non-threaded code is pure poison on some OS's. (HP/UX variants
come to mind).
If you do decide to add a default set of thread callbacks, you'll at least
need a build configuration to disable it - I'm only
Hi Peter,
On Sep 11, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Peter Waltenberg wrote:
You need to be really careful here. Simply being dependent on
pthreads and
linking to non-threaded code is pure poison on some OS's. (HP/UX
variants
come to mind).
I agree. These are systems I personally have no exposure
Option 2 works iff pthreads exists.
-Kyle H
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Sander Temme via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This affects OpenSSL 0.9.8 and trunk.
In engines/e_chil.c around line 594, the engine checks if it has mutex
callbacks to work with and, if not, errors out with the
On Aug 29, 2008, at 2:15 AM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
Option 2 works iff pthreads exists.
Yes, and The Book has some code for Windows that I didn't copy.
If some form of threading is not available, neither the error nor the
fallbacks need to be there. We can wrap both in #ifdef
