> From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Robin Seggelmann via RT
> Sent: Friday, 04 September, 2009 07:29
> Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
> On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> > A fair number of the casts seem to be unnecessary for example in
> > RAND_bytes(), OPEN
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009, Michael Txen wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
>
>>> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Fri Sep 04 13:28:50 2009]:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
>>>
> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Fri Sep 04 09:39:52 2009]:
On Sep 4, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Fri Sep 04 13:28:50 2009]:
On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Fri Sep 04 09:39:52 2009]:
Still wrong castsI hope that's it now
A fair number o
> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Fri Sep 04 13:28:50 2009]:
>
>
> On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
>
> >> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Fri Sep 04 09:39:52 2009]:
> >>
> >>
> >> Still wrong castsI hope that's it now
> >>
> >
> > A fair number of the casts seem to be
On Sep 4, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 14:26 +0200, Michael Tüxen wrote:
On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Fri Sep 04 09:39:52 2009]:
Still wrong castsI hope that's it now
A fair number of the casts
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 14:26 +0200, Michael Tüxen wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
>
> >> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Fri Sep 04 09:39:52 2009]:
> >>
> >>
> >> Still wrong castsI hope that's it now
> >>
> >
> > A fair number of the casts seem to be unnecess
On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Fri Sep 04 09:39:52 2009]:
Still wrong castsI hope that's it now
A fair number of the casts seem to be unnecessary for example in
RAND_bytes(), OPENSSL_malloc() and HMAC(). Do you get warnings on y
On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
>> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Fri Sep 04 09:39:52 2009]:
>>
>>
>> Still wrong castsI hope that's it now
>>
>
> A fair number of the casts seem to be unnecessary for example in
> RAND_bytes(), OPENSSL_malloc() and HMAC(). Do you ge
> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Fri Sep 04 09:39:52 2009]:
>
>
> Still wrong castsI hope that's it now
>
A fair number of the casts seem to be unnecessary for example in
RAND_bytes(), OPENSSL_malloc() and HMAC(). Do you get warnings on your
system without them?
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N.
On Sep 3, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Robin Seggelmann via RT wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Robin Seggelmann via RT wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 3, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Robin Seggelmann via RT wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
>>>
There appear to be several pro
On Sep 3, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Robin Seggelmann via RT wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Robin Seggelmann via RT wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
>>
>>> There appear to be several problems with this patch, see inline:
>>>
[seggelm...@fh-muenster.de -
On Sep 3, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Robin Seggelmann via RT wrote:
>
> On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
>
>> There appear to be several problems with this patch, see inline:
>>
>>> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Aug 31 17:04:19 2009]:
>>>
>>> This patch fixes several issues wit
On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> There appear to be several problems with this patch, see inline:
>
>> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Aug 31 17:04:19 2009]:
>>
>> This patch fixes several issues with DTLS cookies.
>>
> [snip]
>>
>
> cookie_secret is defined:
>
>> +unsi
There appear to be several problems with this patch, see inline:
> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Aug 31 17:04:19 2009]:
>
> This patch fixes several issues with DTLS cookies.
>
[snip]
>
cookie_secret is defined:
> +unsigned char cookie_secret[COOKIE_SECRET_LENGTH];
> +int cookie_initialize
This patch fixes several issues with DTLS cookies. At first the
maximum cookie length was defined as 32 bytes, while the specification
states 256 bytes. Then there was code in the wrong order which
prevented the use of cookies larger than 0 bytes in
ssl3_get_client_hello(), it was tried to
15 matches
Mail list logo
