> [jan.pecha...@sun.com - Wed Mar 03 19:27:30 2010]:
>
>
> commit 18494 changed how HAVE_FORK is dealt with in speed.c. The
> original submitter
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg26278.html)
> correctly stated that HAVE_FORK should be defined by the configure
> s
commit 18494 changed how HAVE_FORK is dealt with in speed.c. The
original submitter
(http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg26278.html)
correctly stated that HAVE_FORK should be defined by the configure
script but wrongly assumed that it really was.
it's not th
