[openssl.org #533] small OpenSSL

2014-06-27 Thread Rich Salz via RT
Not a goal of the project. But a cool effort. On the other hand, openssl fits on telephones now :) __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

[openssl.org #533] small OpenSSL

2014-06-27 Thread Rich Salz via RT
Not a goal of the project. But a cool effort. On the other hand, openssl fits on telephones now :) __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

[openssl.org #533] small OpenSSL

2004-01-11 Thread via RT
How much is the size of the TLS client (without including the crypto library) you succeeded to get until know ? Thanks. Sam __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

[openssl.org #533] Small OpenSSL

2003-11-18 Thread Martin Witzel via RT
The attached files in my last entry from 2003-11-12 apparently did not make it here into the repository. I got requests from readers who mentioned this (thanks) and indeed, I do not see them either. Here is the diff file for the 0.9.7c source (See attached file: diff-0.9.7c_vs_small.tar.gz)

[openssl.org #533] Small OpenSSL

2003-11-18 Thread Martin Witzel via RT
The second file which should have gone into the request tracker repository; a script which applies the patches to the 0.9.7c source tree. I have sent this file on 2003-11-12 but it did not make it intpo the request tracker. (See attached file: patch-e.sh)

[openssl.org #533] small OpenSSL

2003-03-11 Thread Martin Witzel via RT
Hi there, I have offered the following modifications in the OpenSSL user forum, and Lutz Jaenicke suggested that I submit the changes here. They are a number of modifications to the build process to reduce the size of the openssl libraries and of the openssl executable. You find a README file

Re: [openssl.org #533] small OpenSSL

2003-03-11 Thread rajagopalan ramanujam via RT
I think there are no attachements.. (smallOpenSSL.tar.gz) --- Martin Witzel via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, I have offered the following modifications in the OpenSSL user forum, and Lutz Jaenicke suggested that I submit the changes here. They are a number of modifications to

Re: [openssl.org #533] small OpenSSL

2003-03-11 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 06:51:48PM +0100, rajagopalan ramanujam via RT wrote: I think there are no attachements.. (smallOpenSSL.tar.gz) The request tracker does not send out attachements. You can download them from the corresponding ticket using the web-interface. Best regards, Lutz

Re: [openssl.org #533] small OpenSSL

2003-03-11 Thread Bill Pringlemeir
Lutz == Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: rajagopalan ramanujam via RT wrote: I think there are no attachements.. (smallOpenSSL.tar.gz) Lutz The request tracker does not send out attachements. You can Lutz download them from the corresponding ticket using the Lutz web-interface.

Re: [openssl.org #533] small OpenSSL

2003-03-11 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:35:05PM -0500, Bill Pringlemeir wrote: Lutz == Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: rajagopalan ramanujam via RT wrote: I think there are no attachements.. (smallOpenSSL.tar.gz) Lutz The request tracker does not send out attachements. You can Lutz